- March 14th, 2007, 1:36 pm
#68645
This topic isn't meant to be devisive anyway, I just enjoy talking about christian vs. public education and the benefits of private collegs.
I've heard a lot of speculation about Liberty's future enrollment and all these grandiose plans, and I can't help but wonder how accurate all of the hype is. During my college search,Liberty was on my final list, which included Mars Hill and Samford. The primary reasons that I opted for Samford were its organization, its size (about 3,500- not too large, not too small) and its commitment to maintaining high academic standards.( I was accepted to Samford with the condition of academic probation during first semester). I'm aware of the fact that LU has made a few campus upgrades, but when I was there for CFAW and when I toured it a second time with my parents, I simply felt like I was at a summer camp rather than an actual university.
I'm not trying to offend anyone when I say that, and I'm the strongest advocate of christian colleges that you will find. I met some really nice people on that campus.
I was simply wondering if everyone on here thinks the college should focus more on raising the academic standards rather than expansion of undergrad enrollment. (I know they're not always mutually exclusive). Samford will be right at 5,000 undergrad next year, and they intend to stick at that. Basically, I would compare your college's future to Baylor and ours to Furman (Though many would argue, we're already at that level, see http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/colleg ... _brief.php
What I'm really getting at is, do any of you think it's really possible to - 1. Establish truly christian atmosphere in a campus w/ over 10,000 students 2. Create and Maintain high academic standards within that university. 3. Attract the nation's brightest, christian graduates?
I fear that by the time I have kids and they're old enough to attend college, they won't be able to afford a quality, christian college education.
I've heard a lot of speculation about Liberty's future enrollment and all these grandiose plans, and I can't help but wonder how accurate all of the hype is. During my college search,Liberty was on my final list, which included Mars Hill and Samford. The primary reasons that I opted for Samford were its organization, its size (about 3,500- not too large, not too small) and its commitment to maintaining high academic standards.( I was accepted to Samford with the condition of academic probation during first semester). I'm aware of the fact that LU has made a few campus upgrades, but when I was there for CFAW and when I toured it a second time with my parents, I simply felt like I was at a summer camp rather than an actual university.
I'm not trying to offend anyone when I say that, and I'm the strongest advocate of christian colleges that you will find. I met some really nice people on that campus.
I was simply wondering if everyone on here thinks the college should focus more on raising the academic standards rather than expansion of undergrad enrollment. (I know they're not always mutually exclusive). Samford will be right at 5,000 undergrad next year, and they intend to stick at that. Basically, I would compare your college's future to Baylor and ours to Furman (Though many would argue, we're already at that level, see http://www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/colleg ... _brief.php
What I'm really getting at is, do any of you think it's really possible to - 1. Establish truly christian atmosphere in a campus w/ over 10,000 students 2. Create and Maintain high academic standards within that university. 3. Attract the nation's brightest, christian graduates?
I fear that by the time I have kids and they're old enough to attend college, they won't be able to afford a quality, christian college education.
Keep life simple, follow the principle of Occam's razor
The Dennis Kucinich campaign team

The Dennis Kucinich campaign team





- By LU Armchair coach