What kind of team will we have next year?

#246719

By Th3rd - March 25th, 2009, 11:18 pm

- March 25th, 2009, 11:18 pm #246719

think this is where it should go so here goes

so i dont know if Joel is on the boards yet or not but i just had a convo with him and we were talking about seth and all... Joel said that he wants to lead this team to at least 2 or 3 dances, new fav player right now

4/28/2009 R.I.P. Jeff Taylor

ToTheLeft wrote:because accepting anything less than the best is, as Vanilla Ice would say, a felony

BJWilliams wrote:I think highly of the guy just because he is more of a man than most of you jackwagons

#246722

By Hold My Own - March 25th, 2009, 11:20 pm

- March 25th, 2009, 11:20 pm #246722

Hold My Own wrote:"what kind of team will we have next year?"

A very good one

seriously we'll be in the mix I can promise you that...

Correction...a very very good one

#246795

By Keydetbaseball36 - March 26th, 2009, 8:47 am

- March 26th, 2009, 8:47 am #246795

Hold My Own wrote:
Hold My Own wrote:"what kind of team will we have next year?"

A very good one

seriously we'll be in the mix I can promise you that...

Correction...a very very good one

I honestly think a good one is more appropriate. You will be in the top 5 because the bottom 5 will be that bad again it appears. Radford is going to be the top dog again because well they lost Kenny Thomas (he showed up about 1 in 3 games for them). You are going to be a lot like us in that you will have a young team (granted with some height), but you lost 60% of your starters not to mention about 65% of your offense and 50% of your rebounding. Ohman and Baker seem to disappear some nights and the rest are still young and unproven. We are basically in the same boat but only losing barely over 50% of our points and rebounds with still limited height and no "go-to" guys. You might as well put the two of us, Winthrop, and a wild card team that plays out of body (could be HPU but we say that every year) in the 2-5 slots and you still have a huge gap to overcome to catch Radford (I despise saying that).

#246811

By olldflame - March 26th, 2009, 9:21 am

- March 26th, 2009, 9:21 am #246811

Why does everyone keep saying we lost 3 starters? Brolin was NOT a starter by the end of the year and he almost certainly was NOT going to be a starter next year. End of story. It is totally irrelevant that he started games earlier in the season. James Spencer started games for us too, but he is not a starter. Brolin was beaten out of the starting job. We lost 2 starters, and only 1 was unexpected. The other 2 players leaving had diminishing roles as the season progressed. Please don't tell me I'm candy-coating things. Either it's true or it's not. It's true.