Purple Haize wrote:willflop wrote:If there's a problem with under valuing what he did at UB, what about over valuing? He went 20 and 30 over the 4 years? Throw out the first year, and hes still only 18 and 20. After his best season of 7 amd 5, he finished at 5 and 7 in his last year at UB. The coach that took over Gill's team went 2 and 10, in 2010.
What am i missing? He turned a really bad team into a one time 7 and 5 season, that's it?
There’s a lot more to a record than W-L such as scheduling etc. I don’t know or have the desire to look at who they played non Conference which could contribute to some losses. Taking a dumpster fire that was UB football and winning the MAC and going to a Bowl game. That’s pretty solid. He was on a lot of lists for HC positions. Kansas made some sense. You had a dumpster fire there the way their coach was canned and they are bringing in a guy who had just turned one Program around. Based on what he did at UB that’s was a pretty safe bet. For numerous reasons it got short circuited.
Maybe he has equaled his success at UB here at LU. Maybe he’s plateaued the Program. Maybe he’s the type of coach that can get a program to a certain level of success and then it just levels off.
To his credit he’s been as successful as any Coach LU has had and better than one or two.
Agreed, not taking away from what he did, just trying not to over value it either. Based on the UB hype I've always heard, I was actually surprised to see how pedestrian it looks on paper.
Regarding OOC W/L:
2008 (7/5) - includes wins against UTEP and Army; lost to Pitt and Missouri (understandable).
2009 (5/7) - includes wins against UTEP and G-Webb; lost to UCF and Pitt.
I'm not sure how good Pitt and UCF were back then, but that looks like a pretty standard strength ooc schedule for a G5. Missouri was ranked 5th at the time.
It is interesting when you compare UB to LU, the trend looks pretty much the same. Slow start, peak (UB-bowl game; LU-Playoff), then a regression back to .500 play.
It's possible that the new coach at UB was a mess himself, but I do think it's telling that 2010 would have been fully Gill's team, apart from incoming freshman, and the strong decline that Gill started in 2009 continued. This coach turned it around a bit in his 3rd and 4th years, at least on paper.
New Coach:
2010: 2-10 (with an FCS win)
2011: 3-11
2012: 4-8
2013: 8-4
Looks like Gill did what any average coach could do, left with the program in shambles, and the next coach took them to their 2nd bowl game, bettering Gill's 09 record with 8-4, 4 years later.