- October 1st, 2010, 4:49 pm
#322435
From the class of 09 wrote:Oh, I know this year's revenue won't pay for the stadium expansion, but if they see that the expansion is actually bringing in revenue rather than a wasted cost, it might persuade another expansion. If it was just more to maintain, they might wait until it's cost effective to invest that money. That's all I was trying to say.Kricket wrote: Do you think they don't want to build it up right away only to have a half full stadium, because it creates an illusion that not many people want to watch the games even if the attendance is better than ever, and vice versa, a full stadium allows people to imagine how many people would come to the game if the stadium was bigger? Or is it simply a revenue thing (more people coming means they can afford to build a bigger stadium)?If we sell out the majority of the games this year I could see them start phase 2 after the 2011 season. Revenue from tickets has nothing to do with expansion for us as they can't make much over $1mill from ticket sales. It's all about those boosters!!!














- By thecomeback
- By jmclaughlin