[LUconn]

I really think we will never see Floyd at the 1. It's not like we have a "big lineup" where that would be useful.

[coolhandluke]

I never thought we'd see Damien Hubbard at the 1 but we did. That was under Randy, but its still possible with McKay to see a forward type player with good handles to give our points some rest...

[SuperJon]

With the three guys that we have able to play point (Sanders, Stephene, Curry - in that order) I doubt we'll see Brolin at the 1. He may bring the ball up in transition at times but he'll never be the PG on the floor.

[flamesbball84]

I never thought we'd see Damien Hubbard at the 1 but we did. That was under Randy, but its still possible with McKay to see a forward type player with good handles to give our points some rest...

if McKay plays three point guards, why would he need to play anyone else at the point? Forty minutes spread around by 3 players is an average of 13.33 minutes per game. If one of the PGs can't physically handle playing 13 minutes a game then they need some major conditioning work.

[Cider Jim]

I tend to agree with Super on this one, just because Brolin is the closest thing we have to a wide body, so he needs to play down low on the block, rather than at PG.

[coolhandluke]

well there are always injuries, someone could foul out, suspensions, etc...

but on top of that the point I was trying to make was that Stephene and Sanders will likely share the duties at the 1 and the third person would see very little time. That third person could be Seth or Brolin in my opinion. He might not want to take Seth off his SG role so that he can stay in a rhythm.