Huge peer reviewed study on the efficacy or lack thereof concerning masks
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Purple Haize wrote: ↑November 18th, 2020, 12:50 pm Huge peer reviewed study on the efficacy or lack thereof concerning masks
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/M20-6817
The findings, however, should not be used to conclude that a recommendation for everyone to wear masks in the community would not be effective in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections, because the trial did not test the role of masks in source control of SARS-CoV-2 infection.
During the study period, authorities did not recommend face mask use outside hospital settings and mask use was rare in community settings). This means that study participants' exposure was overwhelmingly to persons not wearing masks.
The potential benefits of a community-wide recommendation to wear masks include combined prevention and source control for symptomatic and asymptomatic persons, improved attention, and reduced potential stigmatization of persons wearing masks to prevent infection of others.
Our results suggest that the recommendation to wear a surgical mask when outside the home among others did not reduce, at conventional levels of statistical significance, the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection in mask wearers in a setting where social distancing and other public health measures were in effect, mask recommendations were not among those measures, and community use of masks was uncommon. Yet, the findings were inconclusive and cannot definitively exclude a 46% reduction to a 23% increase in infection of mask wearers in such a setting.
Thus, these findings do not provide data on the effectiveness of widespread mask wearing in the community in reducing SARS-CoV-2 infections. They do, however, offer evidence about the degree of protection mask wearers can anticipate in a setting where others are not wearing masks and where other public health measures, including social distancing, are in effect. The findings also suggest that persons should not abandon other COVID-19 safety measures regardless of the use of masks. While we await additional data to inform mask recommendations, communities must balance the seriousness of COVID-19, uncertainty about the degree of source control and protective effect, and the absence of data suggesting serious adverse effects of masks.
Me: Take care of the vulnerable and live your life.________________
paradox wrote: ↑November 20th, 2020, 1:00 am The mental health fallout is real. And it's only going to get worse. We are far too complacent, trusting in "experts" and "authorities." Where does it all lead?Haven't you heard? The Great Reset silly. "You'll own nothing. And you'll be happy." The World Economic Forum has our best interest in mind
paradox wrote: ↑November 19th, 2020, 8:23 pm CBS is reporting that suicide claimed more Japanese lives in October than 10 months of Covid. For them, the cure is far worse than the disease.This is true, and the mental health effects of the lockdowns are real, I work in mental health so I see it.
thepostman wrote: ↑November 20th, 2020, 8:45 am Lockdowns are not effective but I don't see any issue in encouraging people not to travel for the holidays. I know people will miss their normal traditions but maybe it is the fact I know military families year in and year out who miss holidays, but I think peoole can become creative in 2020 and still have some meaningful family time virtually or not.When you join the Military you know you don’t always get holidays off and know you won’t always be with Family. That’s part of the deal. As an accountant or bus driver or teacher you don’t make that same deal
At the end of the day people need to be free to do what they want. Just like I am free to say I think it is irresponsible. Especially now that there is a definitive light at the end of this tunnel.
Also, you guys post too many videos. I can't watch them all!![]()
thepostman wrote: ↑November 20th, 2020, 9:03 am The military member signs up for that. Their kids don't.When they (you) have kids they know that’s part of the deal too and make adjustments. Asking the Civilian population to do so in this case isn’t similar and dangerous
thepostman wrote: ↑November 20th, 2020, 9:25 am As a citizen I can give my opinion that mass family gatherings around the holidays is not wise this year.So what you’re saying is you’re not a fan of Government mandated lockdowns?
The military viewpoint is just being used to say that one year away won't be the end of the world. I don't think government mandated lockdowns are the way to go and said as much.
I'll say it again just in case you missed it the 2 other times I have said it. Government mandated lockdowns are not wise. Government suggestions are fine.
I could go on a side rant about the lack of care and compassion the general public have for military families because "it is what they signed up for" but it is Friday and I have a ton of work to do.
stokesjokes wrote: ↑December 14th, 2020, 3:53 pm I can understand African American’s distrust of institutions, that is well earned. Look at things like the Tuskegee experiment. That’s why I hope prominent figures getting the vaccine publicly can ease some concerns. Good leaders need to step up and get the vaccine on camera. Sort of like Princess Diana shaking hands with AIDS patients.The fact that the only example you could come up with is something that was started 80 years ago and discontinued 50 years ago speaks volumes. The distrust has nothing to do with any current institutional practice. It is the result of indoctrination from "leaders" promoting a political agenda.