Knucklehead wrote:What I don't get is the fact that we in the media are given a LU style guide to follow, and the school doesn't follow it themselves.
http://www.liberty.edu/index.cfm?PID=11711
It doesn't make any sense to me at all. If the school continues to be inconsistent in their logos there will be bo real "Brand" to speak of. It will be so watered down noone will know what is what. I don't care about color schemes as much as some, but the logos and lettering should be set in stone.[/url]
I was part of the team that developed the style guide. However, you know at Liberty, once someone gets an idea, they want to see it and.....you know what I mean. The fighting eagle was asked about since they found out the fighting "chicken" rolling his sleeves up was clip art.
As far as using the Prototype Flames logo, it can be used for athletics or school spirit. However, we have been asked by athletics to not use this for our merchandise, so we don't compete with theirs. In fact, I had to fight to use the word "Liberty Flames" (see the female retro jersey shirt). They wanted us to only make merchandise that said "Liberty University".
The old eagle head (80's & 90's) has been officially done away with. Although, if you get a class ring encrusted, it still has that logo, which makes no sense.
By the way, no offense taken. (AND, I'm from the SOUTH!!!!)