LUconn wrote:critical thinking would show us that a prayer for resources that is answered would give us the resources.agreed connie boy
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
LUconn wrote:critical thinking would show us that a prayer for resources that is answered would give us the resources.agreed connie boy
LUconn wrote:critical thinking would show us that a prayer for resources that is answered would give us the resources.It is impossible to put prayer into a statement of critical thinking. IF you are thinking critically then you can not have any part of the supernatural involved. Now if we are going to get into a discussion on prayer that would be interesting.
thesportscritic wrote:I think you are the most frustrating person I have ever been in contact with. I feel like I'm in a "Who's on first?" conversation.LUconn wrote:critical thinking would show us that a prayer for resources that is answered would give us the resources.agreed connie boy
LUconn wrote:thesportscritic wrote:I think you are the most frustrating person I have ever been in contact with. I feel like I'm in a "Who's on first?" conversation.LUconn wrote:critical thinking would show us that a prayer for resources that is answered would give us the resources.agreed connie boy
Purple Haize wrote:True, I guess the answer could be "no", but I think you're taking that out of context. The conversation we were having was about whether or not God could bless us with the resources to do that.LUconn wrote:critical thinking would show us that a prayer for resources that is answered would give us the resources.It is impossible to put prayer into a statement of critical thinking. IF you are thinking critically then you can not have any part of the supernatural involved. Now if we are going to get into a discussion on prayer that would be interesting.
Miracles and Prayer are supernatural things. Critical thinking is not
Sly Fox wrote:First off, let's do our best not to let things get personal. I missed most of yesterday's drama and only got online last night long enough for my lengthy reply to the original epistle by Haize (Mrs. Sly was giving me the look of death when I sat down in front of the keyboard). I love the dialogue in regard to the idea of I-A but I don't like seeing us blasting each other.
I don't think anyone on the board feels we need to be filing the application to go I-A tomorrow. But in order for us to make the leap it requires a great deal of planning and preparation. Saying we need to be battling for I-AA titles before we even think about a move is not prudent IMHO. There is going to come a time when others around us are ready to make the move and we need to be in a position where we can make it happen at that very moment. None of us who are firmly in the FBS camp are ignoring the task at hand of winning at the FCS level. We'd LOVE for us to be winning a few national titles before we make the move. We just don't feel it is imperative.
There is as large of a difference between BCS programs and non-BCS programs as there are between I-A & I-AA. Sure we'd love to someday be in the Rose Bowl someday. But right now we'd be thrilled to have a few 2nd tier I-A schools coming to the mountain every year and possibly getting the experience of a bowl trip to the Big Easy, Memphis or some such place.
As for the Flutie Effect, it is a real phenomenon and it could certainly happen to us. The 83 championship made all Mormons in America BYU fans whether they went to the school or not. While I'm not saying the setup now makes a national championship possible for a non-BCS school it does illustrate the type of bounce we could get nationally from Evangelicals who might then adopt us as their 2nd school after their own alma mater as BC enjoyed after Phelan hauled in that pass. Had Baylor not abandoned their position as the flagbearer of Baptist colleges they might've been in position to get a similar bounce with their womens hoops title a few years ago.
Sly Fox wrote:I agree that our priorities are somewhat different. The I-A camp that I have sat firmly in for over a decade (even through the Karcher years) believe that our moves should be made with our ultimate goal of I-A membership at the forefront. If we are doing this efficiently and successfully, the I-AA success will be a byproduct. Perhaps I am oversimplifying but I believe the FCS/I-AA camp believes we should start looking at FBS membership when we have achieved a certain level of success on the field & int he box office at the FCS level. It is clear distinction and that's why emotions have risen in this thread. I believe both sides have LU's best interests in mind.You somewhat answered your own question in my mind. They are spending the money to become successful on the I-AA level so that things will be ready and "the time right" to make the move up.
As for Appy, JMU, Georgia Southern & Montana ... truth be told they all have administrations who view I-A membership as a goal. Yes, I know that the ASU administrators said following their study that the time wasn't right. But they never said it wasn't a goal. Of course being strapped to the UNC system is holding them back. Geo Southern has never hidden their aspirations and neither has JMU. Do you honestly believe these schools are expending the budgets they have on football with nothing more than FCS in their vision? Montana, well they simply seem content based on the lousy options presented them in their region. It could be argued that all of these schools are already I-A programs who are playing down a level.
paradox wrote:We do need to be opportunistic if something like a smaller 1-A east coast conference starts to develope:
-Marshall
-ECU
-Appalachian
-Delaware
-Liberty
-JMU
-Georgia Southern
possibly UMass, Temple, or Memphis
SuperJon wrote:paradox wrote:We do need to be opportunistic if something like a smaller 1-A east coast conference starts to develope:
-Marshall
-ECU
-Appalachian
-Delaware
-Liberty
-JMU
-Georgia Southern
possibly UMass, Temple, or Memphis
Playing devil's advocate:
Why would those schools leave Conference-USA?
If the current I-AAs won't be in a conference with us on the I-AA level, why do we think they would at the I-A level?