If you want to talk ASUN smack or ramble ad nauseum about your favorite pro or major college teams, this is the place to let it rip.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

By JK37
Registration Days Posts
#662160
And this is why I don’t understand how anyone can predict some mass exodus from the ACC: the GoR, while it stinks for the schools, keeps coming across as iron-clad. Until shown to be breakable, these schools are staying put.
ATrain liked this
User avatar
By Sly Fox
Registration Days Posts
#662162
A judge in North Carolina rules in favor of protecting Tobacco Road and the ACC Cabal against schools from other states. Shocking.

I do find the private equity rumor to be a bit farfetched. PE wants guaranteed return on their investment and I don't see where additional revenue is derived at this stage, I work with PE firms on the regular and this just doesn't smell right.

However the idea that FSU & Clemson could wind up in the Big XII is not crazy talk. Particularly if the buyouts prove in court to be more reasonable. While ESPN currently has incentive for the status quo with the ACC Network to remain in place, the idea of losing its most valuable commodities to their top competitors is not attractive.
By ballcoach15
Registration Days Posts
#662177
If a judge is protecting Tobacco Road, why don't he kick non-tobacco road schools out of the ACC ? Bringing in all those former Big East schools was where ACC began dying.
By thepostman
#662178
You mean Big East schools like Virginia Tech???? :dontgetit

You always say the Big East is the reason the conference is dying but if it wasn't for that happening the conference would've died a long time ago.

The truth is, like the PAC-12, the ACC did not forsee the college football landscape changing so much, so fast and because of that they're fighting for their lives.
ATrain, LUOrange liked this
By ATrain
Registration Days Posts
#662181
ballcoach15 wrote: July 11th, 2024, 2:40 pm If a judge is protecting Tobacco Road, why don't he kick non-tobacco road schools out of the ACC ? Bringing in all those former Big East schools was where ACC began dying.
Because that's not how the law works :roll: :roll: :roll:
By thepostman
#662191
ballcoach15 wrote: July 11th, 2024, 4:28 pm VT belongs in ACC. What has Louisville, Notre Dame, Syracuse, Pittsburgh and Boston College brought to the conference ?
I already answered this question. They kept the ACC afloat during a time of change. All of them, minus maybe BC, have contributed to the conference over the years. The ACC allowed other conferences to pass them by refusing to change with the times by listening to too many people that have your mindset.
ATrain, Baybird liked this
By ATrain
Registration Days Posts
#662192
thepostman wrote: July 12th, 2024, 3:27 pm
ballcoach15 wrote: July 11th, 2024, 4:28 pm VT belongs in ACC. What has Louisville, Notre Dame, Syracuse, Pittsburgh and Boston College brought to the conference ?
I already answered this question. They kept the ACC afloat during a time of change. All of them, minus maybe BC, have contributed to the conference over the years. The ACC allowed other conferences to pass them by refusing to change with the times by listening to too many people that have your mindset.
Exactly. The PAC-12 and ACC made a HUGE mistake not grabbing Big 12 schools after Texas and Oklahoma left. Had the ACC brought in WVU, Kansas and Kansas State, and made a scheduling alliance with the SEC (think Kansas v. Missouri returning to an annual thing, a Battle at Bristol every year with Virginia Tech, UVA, Tennessee, and Vandy alternating every year, etc...), rather than trusting the B1G to be a partner to provide stability, the conversations happening today would be a lot different.
Purple Haize liked this
By ballcoach15
Registration Days Posts
#662198
Pittsburgh, Notre Dame, Louisville came into ACC and won a few football games over VT, Clemson, FSU and Miami, thus costing them higher rankings and probably playoff spots. VT, Clemson, and FSU have to carry flag for ACC football., for conference to be strong, and on par with other conferences.
User avatar
By cruzan_flame13
Posts
#662203
TH Spangler wrote: July 13th, 2024, 4:45 pm Sounds like 6 ACC to the B12.
If that process actually works out, the ACC better connect with the PAC2 and four of the top G5 schools. USF, Tulane, App State, BSU, SDSU, East Carolina, Memphis and hopefully Liberty are their choices.
LUOrange liked this
By ATrain
Registration Days Posts
#662208
ballcoach15 wrote: July 13th, 2024, 1:11 pm Pittsburgh, Notre Dame, Louisville came into ACC and won a few football games over VT, Clemson, FSU and Miami, thus costing them higher rankings and probably playoff spots. VT, Clemson, and FSU have to carry flag for ACC football., for conference to be strong, and on par with other conferences.
Sounds to me like your issue is that VT, Clemson, FSU, and Miami aren't the powerhouses that your mind has built them up to be.
JK37, aredd33, Baybird liked this
User avatar
By cruzan_flame13
Posts
#662211
TH Spangler wrote: July 14th, 2024, 1:30 pm Plus Memphis, Temple, ECU, Liberty in the PAA :D Most likely App though.


Image
Liberty will have to pull a stunt like SMU and put more money into the program in order to even have some talks with the commissioner. Then we have to have the majority of the schools to approve membership, which I doubt will occur (cultural and political differences). The furthest we will likely go is the AAC if they become very desperate like CUSA was, and by that time, that conference will be more of a lateral move. That's just the reality of this business, Unless we have some black mail on some of the presidents of ACC (or whatever the conference will be) schools, we are at the highest we will be in FBS. I had said money talks, but those schools would rather take any other school than us realistically speaking. As @tyndal23 used to say, if the corporation known as the United States of America still exists by then :lol:
User avatar
By LUOrange
Registration Days Posts
#662212
I still have a hard time believing that Clemson and FSU have thrown this big of a hissy-fit to join the Big 12. I still believe that they're heading to the SEC, regardless of what Sankey has said officially. I, also don't care what the B1G has said officially.
Last edited by LUOrange on July 15th, 2024, 10:23 am, edited 1 time in total.
By ballcoach15
Registration Days Posts
#662219
Too late now, but the NCAA should have put a limit on number of teams a conference can have. These large conferences create unbalanced schedules. For football, every team should play everyone in their conference each season. How can any conference crown a real champion when everyone doesn't play same schedule ?
By ATrain
Registration Days Posts
#662255
JK37 wrote: July 15th, 2024, 1:58 pm What is the significance of a conference champion?

What gives the NCAA the right to regulate such a thing?
The NCAA is the governing body of college athletics for the colleges/conferences that choose to participate in the organization. If the NCAA had said a conference can only have X number of teams, it would've been within their right to do so.

How a conference chooses its champion, the NCAA rightfully delegated that to the conferences.

Ultimately, the NCAA will likely cease to be the major body for college sports in the next 10 years or so. B1G and SEC are likely to break away at some point, with some ACC and Big XII schools in tow.
LUOrange liked this
User avatar
By LUOrange
Registration Days Posts
#662258
Ill flame wrote: July 16th, 2024, 9:07 am This would explain the recent Florida state to big 12 rumors.

I call BS. This means nothing. FSU & Clemson wouldn't have thrown such hissy fits just to move to the B12. The SEC is also not going to publicly admit to tampering. I'm not buying this until proven wrong.
By thepostman
#662260
Not that Florida has as much power in the SEC as it once did but Florida has never wanted anything to do with FSU coming into the SEC. I can't imagine that changing anytime soon.

Currently as things sit the Big 12 is in a much better situation for the future than the ACC so it's really not so crazy in this new world of college athletics.
By JK37
Registration Days Posts
#662263
ATrain wrote: July 16th, 2024, 7:49 am
JK37 wrote: July 15th, 2024, 1:58 pm What is the significance of a conference champion?

What gives the NCAA the right to regulate such a thing?
The NCAA is the governing body of college athletics for the colleges/conferences that choose to participate in the organization. If the NCAA had said a conference can only have X number of teams, it would've been within their right to do so.

How a conference chooses its champion, the NCAA rightfully delegated that to the conferences.

Ultimately, the NCAA will likely cease to be the major body for college sports in the next 10 years or so. B1G and SEC are likely to break away at some point, with some ACC and Big XII schools in tow.
If the NCAA tried to cap the number of members of a conference, a conference would’ve sued and won. The NCAA is powerless, and it’s not the NCAA’s fault.
  • 1
  • 587
  • 588
  • 589
  • 590
  • 591
  • 607
2025 Season Thread

I think I was most impressed by the pitching and d[…]

Auburn

Another heart breaking loss. 2-1. We out hit Aubur[…]

2/13 at UTEP

Maughmer, Peter, Cleveland, Aquino, (Porter or M[…]

2024-25 Season Thread

I will never in the existence of mankind until th[…]