- August 22nd, 2022, 3:19 pm
#644297
Since the ACC started sleeping with Notre Dame, does anyone know ND's W-L record vs ACC ?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
ballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 22nd, 2022, 3:19 pm Since the ACC started sleeping with Notre Dame, does anyone know ND's W-L record vs ACC ?They have a winning records v. Virginia Tech
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ATrain wrote: ↑August 22nd, 2022, 6:29 pmWhat about the top ACC teamsballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 22nd, 2022, 3:19 pm Since the ACC started sleeping with Notre Dame, does anyone know ND's W-L record vs ACC ?They have a winning records v. Virginia Tech
Sports Business Journal" wrote:Big Ten expansion? Here’s what the contracts sayClick Here for Full Story
If Notre Dame joins the Big Ten within the next seven years, CBS, Fox and NBC know exactly how much extra they will have to pay in rights fees. That specific dollar figure, which is not publicly known, is spelled out in the contracts.
No other school is mentioned in these deals by name, and the contracts don’t assign a dollar figure to any other school that may join the conference, according to several sources. Notre Dame is the only school that has specific language about escalators.
Purple Haize wrote: ↑August 22nd, 2022, 8:59 pmWe all know BC only cares about VTATrain wrote: ↑August 22nd, 2022, 6:29 pmWhat about the top ACC teamsballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 22nd, 2022, 3:19 pm Since the ACC started sleeping with Notre Dame, does anyone know ND's W-L record vs ACC ?They have a winning records v. Virginia Tech
But not too bad
https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomlayberg ... 37a42f6dd5
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
alabama24 wrote: ↑August 23rd, 2022, 8:41 pmI don't get UVA since their biggest appeal is the DC market which the big ten already has. UNC and Georgia tech makes sense given the big tens current strategy. They are both great academic schools that will bring in big markets. I think they are working off the assumption that all these mediocre teams they are adding will get better with the huge tv money they'll be getting. Rutgers still isn't getting a full share of the tv money and it's already starting to payoff for them in basketball.ATrain wrote: ↑August 23rd, 2022, 6:42 pm Georgia Tech, UNC, and UVA.
ATrain wrote: ↑August 22nd, 2022, 6:56 pm Oregon is looking to go to the B1G:"The report this week that Oregon and the Big Ten had informally met feels like a convenient leak. It’s a way for Oregon to signal to the rest of the Pac-12, like your ex who broke up with you through body language signals and well-placed cues, this isn’t going to last much longer, honey."
https://www.saturdaydownsouth.com/sport ... er-report/
flamehunter wrote: ↑August 23rd, 2022, 3:02 pm Apparently math is not Baybird's strong suit - 36-10 is a .783 winning %. 46-10 would have been .821.GUILTY!
ballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 24th, 2022, 8:17 am I hope someday college sports get back to playing the game, and trying to win championships, instead of seeing who can have the biggest conference, and biggest TV contract.That ship has already sailed. Glad I won't be around for the total destruction of college sports.
Ill flame wrote: ↑August 24th, 2022, 12:12 amHonestly, Maryland gave them the Baltimore market more than it did the DC market. The majority of the environs in DC and NOVA care more about UVA and VT than they do the Terps, despite the fact that College Park is basically right next door to the district.alabama24 wrote: ↑August 23rd, 2022, 8:41 pmI don't get UVA since their biggest appeal is the DC market which the big ten already has. UNC and Georgia tech makes sense given the big tens current strategy. They are both great academic schools that will bring in big markets. I think they are working off the assumption that all these mediocre teams they are adding will get better with the huge tv money they'll be getting. Rutgers still isn't getting a full share of the tv money and it's already starting to payoff for them in basketball.ATrain wrote: ↑August 23rd, 2022, 6:42 pm Georgia Tech, UNC, and UVA.
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 24th, 2022, 11:06 am I read this morning that 1 school (I believe it was LSU) signed 24 players off the transfer portal. Why the NCAA allowed "free agency" to happen is puzzling. Some rogue coaches have basically stopped recruiting high school players, and focus mainly on players on other college teams.Coaches don’t build programs anymore; they build new teams every year. It’s here to stay. Adapt or die.
ballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 25th, 2022, 6:41 am That is true. I can't believe NCAA allowed this to happen. Poor leadership, I guess. Transfers should be allowed only for hardship cases.Poor leadership.......or giving kids control of choosing their own course? Also, LU has been quite the beneficiary of the transfer portal over the past few seasons. For us in particular, and using only one example, look at the platform Malik now has; the recognition and representation he has already afforded us has been tremendous. I would also say he was all the better for it, too.
ballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 25th, 2022, 6:41 am That is true. I can't believe NCAA allowed this to happen. Poor leadership, I guess. Transfers should be allowed only for hardship cases.As long as coaches can change wherever and whenever they go, student-athletes should be allowed the same freedom. It’s not perfect, it’s very messy, but it’s the best system we’ve got.
ballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 25th, 2022, 6:41 am That is true. I can't believe NCAA allowed this to happen. Poor leadership, I guess. Transfers should be allowed only for hardship cases.Actually its great leadership. Scholarships are a 1 year contract, not 4+.
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right