Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
ballcoach15 wrote: ↑August 31st, 2020, 8:17 pm Don't expect any quick release of information from investigation .I agree that it’s gonna be a few months for the investigation. Maybe over a year.
I read somewhere that board gave Dr. Prevo the power to make any immediate changes, he deems necessary. (or something to that effect)
Whether it’s academic institutions, mission organizations, churches or denominations, the term “independent investigation” has become almost fashionable. When an organization is confronted with public allegations of sexual or financial abuse within its ranks, it finds itself under a bright spotlight as the watching world waits to see how it will respond.Give it a read
All too often, the overriding institutional concern has very little to do with caring for the victims and the wounded and everything to do with protecting its reputation by doing everything it can to shut off the spotlight and "move on."
This is often accomplished by the institution announcing that it will launch an “independent investigation." The organization proceeds to hire a law firm to investigate the matter with the hope that this process will calm everyone down and eventually turn off the spotlight.
paradox wrote: ↑August 31st, 2020, 12:38 pm ....She was specifically referring to the Falkirk Center as far as defunding. I checked to see the current lineup. Seems there has been quite a bit of shakeup from the last time I saw. They now have DOCTOR Gorka, It's past time to pull the plug on that.
Whatever gets done. Let's hope that cooler heads prevail. Would hate to see this thing descend into a Salem-like hysteria. We already have a former prof tweeting exasperating things like, "heaping coals of shame" and "in love and grace, please defund"
ballah09 wrote: ↑August 31st, 2020, 10:51 pm I don't know if this was posted so I apologize if it was. Jr threatening Giancarlo and screen shot of pic of the female student.Is that screenshot legit? They rushed right past that and I’ve never seen it anywhere else. If so, and of a student, that’s a bigger story than pool boy imo.
stokesjokes wrote: ↑August 31st, 2020, 11:11 pmI believe this is might be the photo JJ said was of one of his daughter in law showing her "granny panties". I will have to go back and find the article where he said that . There have been so many lately...ballah09 wrote: ↑August 31st, 2020, 10:51 pm I don't know if this was posted so I apologize if it was. Jr threatening Giancarlo and screen shot of pic of the female student.Is that screenshot legit? They rushed right past that and I’ve never seen it anywhere else. If so, and of a student, that’s a bigger story than pool boy imo.
Screenshot shared at 6:50 if you want to skip past what we already know
ALAFlamesFan wrote: I believe this is might be the photo JJ said was of one of his daughter in law showing her "granny panties". I will have to go back and find the article where he said that . There have been so many lately...Can you imagine sending a photo of yourself in underwear to your in laws?!?
Didlibertywin wrote: ↑September 1st, 2020, 11:11 am Larry Flynt weighs in:I don't really disagree with anything he had to say. I said it earlier, Exodus 20:7 does say "the Lord will not hold him guiltless who takes his name in vain." And some translations exchange "Hold him guiltless" for "Acquit." Which kinda sounds like an exclusion from Salvation.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/larry-fly ... e-falwells