paradox wrote:On the contrary, I'm really not out to attack anyone; I'm just trying to offer a different perspective and add a little insight into some things.
I really only had two points, but after all of the ad hominem attacks, I added two more:
1. New teams take time to develope and jell as a team; and we can still get this thing done this season; there is ample time.
2. Any success in the history of LU basketball is connected with Dunton being here as the head coach or top assistant. He is not a loser and given the context I think that he's been more than respectable.
3. Dunton is a player's coach and if he gets terminated it may be a bigger set-back than some of you are prepared to deal with.
4. The LU basketball job is not as coveted as some of you seem to imagine. Guys like Dunton and Meyer may be as good as it gets here at this juncture. Granted, if we move up to a bigger conference, then we could draw some higher profile interest. At that point, all bets are off and we take the big time guy, if available. I'm a little hesitant to jump on the wagon to let this guy go and potentially inherit the next Hankinson.
I'm anxious to see exactly where we are at with this team at the end of the season. I'm optimistic enough to still beleive in these guys.
Some of my views on Dunton and Meyer are purely subjective, however, new faces needing time to take shape as a team is just a reality of the game, and if you can't comprehend that, then you just don't get it with the game at all. That being said, if this team does not come together as a team at some point this season, then the responsibility will fall squarely on the shoulders of the head coach, and depending upon a complete evaluation, a coaching change may be in order .
Your final sentance is something I think most everyone can agree with, and I am glad to see you are not totally closed-minded, but being pretty reasonable with your arguments. I would like to address your points, if I may.
Point #1. Fifth year, after a horrible fourth year. The PROGRAM under Coach Dunton should not need time to gell. Besides, who's fault is it that this is a "new team" as you say?
Point #2. Hard to argue with you there. But even a blind squirrel finds a nut every once in awhile. I don't think anyone really considers him to be a loser, except LUzer.
Point #3. A player's coach? It must take a pretty special player's coach to have total player (and staff and support staff) turnover over the past 3 years.
Point #4. Hank should have been given a couple more years. That way he may have been able to fully implement his defensive scheme

LU is a D-I job with a decent facility and solid financial backing. Who knows the numbers and quality of coaches that would have applied if the job had not been back-doored four years ago.