Sly Fox wrote:UT has had major changes in leadership in the past year. The positions of the current leadership are not as cut & dried as some suspect. The only thing I can tell you without question is they oppose UH & SMU as candidates. In fact, UT & UH are in a bit of a public turf war over the nation's 4th largest city.
It looks like expansion is coming but it appears to be just for expansion sake and not because there are qualified candidates. The only option that I like sits in Colorado Springs and is not an apparent candidate. Otherwise I am in the camp that believes they should go after FSU and either fight the GOR in court or wait it out. In a perfect world, Arkansas and Texas A&M would be back where they belong with LSU in tow. But there is zero chance of that occurring.
Hey, you and I agree on something. Houston and SMU don't bring value to the conference.
But your second paragraph? C'mon. The only reason Texas fans don't see qualified candidates is because their shortsighted. No, there is not a perfect candidate out there. In fact, there really isn't one with an incredibly attractive history. But you need to think outside of the box. Who is going all around the world to host football camps? Jim Harbaugh. Which school just dominated the NFL draft and is killing it in recruiting again? Ohio State. The SEC is still dominant, the Big10 is possibly 1-2 years away from being as dominant, the Pac12 is deep and say what you will about the ACC, but the conference has had a team in the championship/playoffs for each of the past three years. My point is that there's a lot of value in the available candidates if you look deep enough.
No, Cincinnati will not compete for playoffs within five years of being added. However, imagine the following scenario and you'll see the value. You're a fan of football but not necessarily a fan of a particular local team. You live in Dayton, Ohio (about midway between Columbus and Cincinnati) and Ohio State is hosting Tulsa next weekend. On the same day, Cincinnati is hosting Texas. The advantage to the Big12 is that Texas and Oklahoma will now have exposure in areas largely dominated by other conferences. Cincinnati, Memphis, USF/UCF all come with the advantage mentioned above. It's not perfect. It's not great. But there is absolutely value in those programs.
Lastly, why on earth would Florida State leave the ACC? And why would Texas A&M or Arkansas leave the SEC? All of those schools understand the control Texas has on the 9 other programs in the Big12. Why would they want to leave and be apart of that mess? Pipe-dream.