[NotAJerry]

Meh, it's just the same pattern as the last 2 weeks. Good first quarter, things go a bit sideways in the second and we fall behind, and now we'll dominate the third and fourth quarters and win.

[01LUGrad]

Meh, it's just the same pattern as the last 2 weeks. Good first quarter, things go a bit sideways in the second and we fall behind, and now we'll dominate the third and fourth quarters and win.

+1

[flamesfan30]

Were not our best in 2nd qtrs. Down 14 13

[01LUGrad]

We need good Josh to get back into the game.

[thepostman]

Ugh.

[01LUGrad]

AHHHHHH!!!!!!

[Purple Haize]

Interesting to see if it stands

[sporter]

That is a fumble - no overturn please

[Purple Haize]

Let's bag the Officials Hate Us talk shall we

[thepostman]

Great play. Now they go for 2 which is dumb.

[NotAJerry]

Glad it stood, but how in the world do you go for 2 there? Come on coaches, stop chasing points in the 2nd bleeping quarter.

[01LUGrad]

Why the heck do you go for 2 there????

[Purple Haize]

I disagree. Good call. At 19 or 20 a TD beats you. At 21 it's tied

[sporter]

Why 2 here? Just do not agree with that. We have struggled in that area.

[SuperJon]

We've gotta teach Gill when to go for 2 and when to take the points.

[-army56mike-]

What!?! Why two!?! What!?!

[Purple Haize]

Are people having problems with math?

[phoenix]

Turner Gill is infatuated with the 2-point conversion. We've got a kicker with a leg, and don't let him kick.

AND the ESPN guys mocking Lunsford's leg is getting annoying. Somebody needs to smack them or something.

[NotAJerry]

Are people having problems with math?

No, we're having a problem with the stupidity of doing it in the first half of a game where your D has made 2 bad plays all day long. It's just a ridiculous decision. You absolutely don't chase points unless it's late in a close game or you're way behind and need to get as many points as possible on each score.

[Purple Haize]

Turner Gill is infatuated with the 2-point conversion. We've got a kicker with a leg, and don't let him kick.

AND the ESPN guys mocking Lunsford's leg is getting annoying. Somebody needs to smack them or something.

Someone send the announcers the link of the 60 yd FG to shut the Color guy up

[-army56mike-]

I disagree. Good call. At 19 or 20 a TD beats you. At 21 it's tied

Yes, now at 19 a TD beats you. Whereas before, if we'd taken the extrea point, a TD would only have tied you. The extra point would beat you. And we know from experience, there is always a chance to block that thing. We could have been up by a couple FGs. Now two FGs beats us. I disagree, and think it was a bad call to go for 2 at this point.

[sporter]

Sit on it here

[Purple Haize]

Are people having problems with math?

No, we're having a problem with the stupidity of doing it in the first half of a game where your D has made 2 bad plays all day long. It's just a ridiculous decision. You absolutely don't chase points unless it's late in a close game or you're way behind and need to get as many points as possible on each score.

But how is it chasing points? There isn't a big difference being up 5 points or 6 points. But 7 points is another story

[Purple Haize]

I disagree. Good call. At 19 or 20 a TD beats you. At 21 it's tied

Yes, now at 19 a TD beats you. Whereas before, if we'd taken the extrea point, a TD would only have tied you. We could have been up by a couple FGs. Now two FGs beats us. I disagree, and think it was a bad call to go for 2 at this point.

If we'd kicked the extra point a TD and extra point beats us.
Kicking 2 FG's is still 2 possessions where you are assuming we wouldn't at least get a FG in the mean time

[thepostman]

With how that half was heading I will take the 5 point lead at halftime. Other then that long pass the defense has played very well.