bluejacket wrote:VAGolf wrote:That's mostly what I was getting at. He's done a good job of developing QB's too. He's probably the best option that Nebraska had, and it's probably not a bad hire either.
My point is that you can win PAC-12 championships at Oregon State or win 9 games every year with an average recruiter/great coach combination because you touch California. Erickson won a Fiesta Bowl at Oregon State because he could recruit players from California. Riley did the same thing, even though he was not nearly as strong of a recruiter. Even if you are not a great recruiter, the second and third tier players in California can be coached them into a very competitive PAC-12 program.
There is no regional recruiting base close to Nebraska, let alone touching it, so you have to have a great recruiter to offset those deficiencies. When Nebraska was a national power, the best players came from all over the country. I think that there is a unfortunate intersection coming together in Nebraska. Mike Riley could succeed in a lot of places, but I don't think that Lincoln, Nebraska is one of them.
1. He's recruited Texas almost as much as California.
2. California is also recruited by UCLA, USC, Stanford, Arizona State, Arizona, Texas, Oregon, Cal, Washington, Washington State, Fresno State, and San Diego State. Duke has also recruited a lot in California for the past three seasons.
There aren't that many recruits in Nebraska or surrounding states, but who are they competing with? Iowa, Kansas State....and______
Riley isn't Kiffin or Saban when it comes to recruiting, but recruiting at Oregon State isn't easy either.