Interesting little tidbit I read on the Villanova board in regards to UAB dropping football:
Just football. Similar to what temple is going to do.
Now I'm starting to think about what schools actually make sense for dropping their programs in the current landscape.
Seems obvious that the Power 5 conference schools, Notre Dame, BYU, and the service academies are going to be fine.
UAB is gone. Temple makes some sense as they don't draw even in the rare years when they're good, but they have improved on both the winning and attendance front in recent years. UMass may be in serious trouble despite the new stadium with the MAC kicking them out. I would have said UNLV is in trouble, but the Fertitta's are going to pump $30 million into that program for facilities and the next coach so that's not going anywhere. Hawaii is in serious trouble and there are already talks of FCS or no football. If Louisiana Monroe has a run of bad years on the field again, they could be gone. I wonder about the entire MAC, especially with the continued economic decline of the region. Are more Alabama schools in trouble or was UAB just the result of the Crimson Tide pulling a power play? I can't see Idaho sticking around FBS too much longer, it just doesn't make sense.
Feels like there could be a decent number of moving targets in the not too distant future to open up opportunities. I'll agree that whenever paying players happens that it will massively shift the landscape. That seems like the time that will result in 5 power conferences of 16 teams each with everyone else locked out of the top tier. Getting up to speed in C-USA or something similar would help our chances of catching on with one of those.