flamesfilmguy wrote:There's an old saying that goes like this... "Money can't buy happiness." I think we are the poster children for this. We have all the money as a program we could ever need, yet.... Still no playoffs. So answer me this oh red tinted spectacled one, how can you explain this? Who is responsible? Are we to just sit around and go "yay we came close yet again!" At some point and inward look is needed. Definition of insanity: "doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results"-Albert Einstein ... Welcome to Liberty Football. For the clinically insane.
I don't think you can point to one single person with that one ffg. I think really it will take a bit of a paradigm shift from the top down as far as the "big three" goes. If you look at swimming and field hockey, while they are not big time sports, we didn't go for "name hires" and they are showing significant growth. I think that if we do not make a change at the top in football (which I do not think happens this offseason regardless of the result this weekend), we need to establish a solid identity on both sides of the ball, and then find the best 22 guys who fit that identity. There needs to be open competition for all 22 spots (or 44 for the two-deep) from spring ball all the way through training camp. The best players rise to the occasion, the rest...ride the pine. I have said this before, but I think we need to look at moving to a more uptempo offense utilizing the read option and a much better screen game. I can give more thoughts later along that line but I will move on...
IF there is a change, we shouldn't go the D1 or "name hire" route. we should look at a D2 or even D3 coach, or even a young assistant. I think PH suggested something like that on the basketball front (maybe football I'm not sure)...point is, if we want to see this program continue to grow, it ought to be with someone who grows along with the program, much like with the aforementioned swimming and field hockey programs