- February 12th, 2013, 8:57 pm
#419991
What's the story... or is there a story? Any word on replacements?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
Torbush Announces Retirement from Coaching*"Knew a month ago" but didnt wanna screw up HCTG's recruiting. pretty cool of him to hang in there.
February 12, 2013
Lynchburg, Va.
Carl Torbush, Liberty's assistant head football coach and linebackers coach, announced his retirement from coaching earlier today.
"On behalf of our staff and players, we thank Carl for his godly experience and the knowledge he possessed to develop young men to glorify Christ here at Liberty University," said Liberty head football coach Turner Gill. "We want nothing but the best for he and his family in all their future endeavors."
forbidden wrote:I wonder if Wimberly will go back to doing LB's and Roberts get whole secondary. Minter is no longer here to jump in and do safeties now, so might as well look at that scenario. But thank goodness I´m not the head man in charge, so im just guessing.FIFY
PAmedic wrote:is that the way these searches are normally done?Might be HR policy to have it posted publicly for a set period of time (7-14 days?). Doesn't mean any of the applications through official channels will be seriously considered.
flameshaw wrote:I would give the sports program a C overall when it comes to dealing with/reaching out former players. I know they could do a lot better and tap into a huge resource for future donations, etc. IMVVVVHO.By and large (and there is strong data to back this up), student-athlete alumni who received a partial or full scholarship for the athletic exploits are one of the hardest markets to tap for giving. The research doesn't indicate a definitive reason, but my conjecture is that it has to do with the entitlement complex that takes root in many such individuals.
JK37 wrote:Not to mention, in the context of Liberty specifically, the highest levels of administration expressly dislike private development. So, not sure the acquisition of monetary donations in the future is of any consequence or motivation.Is this something that's common knowledge? Do you have a source? I'm curious because I've never read/heard this before.
adam42381 wrote:JK37 wrote:Not to mention, in the context of Liberty specifically, the highest levels of administration expressly dislike private development. So, not sure the acquisition of monetary donations in the future is of any consequence or motivation.Is this something that's common knowledge? Do you have a source? I'm curious because I've never read/heard this before.
Purple Haize wrote:Interesting. Has Jr. ever given an explanation behind this line of thinking? BJ, maybe it's time for another PM...adam42381 wrote:JK37 wrote:Not to mention, in the context of Liberty specifically, the highest levels of administration expressly dislike private development. So, not sure the acquisition of monetary donations in the future is of any consequence or motivation.Is this something that's common knowledge? Do you have a source? I'm curious because I've never read/heard this before.
It is common knowledge and he is spot on.
adam42381 wrote:Completely true. Jr doesn't like big monetary donations because he feels like it gives the donor a seat at the table. He doesn't like anyone having control other than himself (see: new logo). He believes that the Harvards and Yales and Baylors lost their way religiously because they allowed donors a seat at the table to influence how they did things.JK37 wrote:Not to mention, in the context of Liberty specifically, the highest levels of administration expressly dislike private development. So, not sure the acquisition of monetary donations in the future is of any consequence or motivation.Is this something that's common knowledge? Do you have a source? I'm curious because I've never read/heard this before.
. 
- By Baybird
- By alabama24
- By Chippy