- February 11th, 2013, 11:24 am
#419850
I'm fascinated by Papal selection. Surprised he is stepping down, but lets discuss the top replacements. No, JLFJR is not eligible 
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Purple Haize wrote:I'm fascinated by Papal selection. Surprised he is stepping down, but lets discuss the top replacements. No, JLFJR is not eligibleWhat about Jonathan?
SuperJon wrote:I nominate Jed Bartlet.Can you imagine Leo McGarry, Toby Zeigler or Josh Lyman in the Vatican?!
phoenix wrote:I think that folks "in the know" are surprised he's still in office. They looked at him as a "transitional pope" that could fix some problems and lead while the guy they really want in the office got more experience.Is this like hiring an interim coach?
I hate you Merry Christmas :D :lol: May[…]