Humble_Opinion wrote:Did Purp commit plagiarism?yep. I watch it when I eat dinner lol
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Humble_Opinion wrote:Did Purp commit plagiarism?yep. I watch it when I eat dinner lol
jbock13 wrote:So YOU are the other 2 lolHumble_Opinion wrote:Did Purp commit plagiarism?yep. I watch it when I eat dinner lol
Purple Haize wrote:I don't. Can't really stand her. Typical Bush hack. Although I'm sure she's a nice person. I liked Bob's little bit about how we should get out of Afghanistan. Then he went back to being wrong again.jbock13 wrote:So YOU are the other 2 lolHumble_Opinion wrote:Did Purp commit plagiarism?yep. I watch it when I eat dinner lol
I just have a thing for Dana Perrino.
I liked Bob's little bit about how we should get out of Afghanistan. Then he went back to being wrong again.Agreed. Although I think as we fly the last cargo planes out we should do a massive airdrop of burning Korans and dead pigs near the rioters. That ought to get them really riled up.
Humble_Opinion wrote:Exactly!I liked Bob's little bit about how we should get out of Afghanistan. Then he went back to being wrong again.Agreed. Although I think as we fly the last cargo planes out we should do a massive airdrop of burning Korans and dead pigs near the rioters. That ought to get them really riled up.
jbock13 wrote:Read sometime about how we quashed radical Muslims in the Moro War.Humble_Opinion wrote:Exactly!I liked Bob's little bit about how we should get out of Afghanistan. Then he went back to being wrong again.Agreed. Although I think as we fly the last cargo planes out we should do a massive airdrop of burning Korans and dead pigs near the rioters. That ought to get them really riled up.You really are coming around!
He's getting votes now he won't get in the general election because, by their own admission, the Democrats don't want to run against RomneyDo you really think the Democrats would be stupid enough to tell us who they truly don't want to run against? Their policies are insane/suicidal but their political tactics are more effective than the Republicans.
Humble_Opinion wrote:Considering they are running ads in MI to get voters out for Santorum......I think it answers your own question. It is no secret that Team Obama, the Chicago Branch, are gearing up for Romney. Every political pundit knows that Obama would LOVE anyone but Romney and maybe Paul.He's getting votes now he won't get in the general election because, by their own admission, the Democrats don't want to run against RomneyDo you really think the Democrats would be stupid enough to tell us who they truly don't want to run against? Their policies are insane/suicidal but their political tactics are more effective than the Republicans.
jbock13 wrote:Nothing cracks me up more than when Democrats tell us how to beat them. Supposedly. Haize, you're free to like Mitt. But to listen to what people who won't even vote for Mitt have to say about it, that's just absurd.I was memorized by Dana's eyes. I have no idea what you a trying to say?
jbock13 wrote:The brokered convention won't happen, so let's just get that out of our minds. That's something the media brings up just to cover a slow news day.They are not advising us how in regards to Romney. They are encouraging people to vote for Santorum over Romney. Now unless they are working a double double switcharoonie I think it's obvious who they want to face and who they don't want to face.
Once again, I'll ask, why would the Democrats advise us how to beat Obama?
Purple Haize wrote:No, the bottom line is that you're not objective. You want your guy to win and are totally ignorant to all other facts that don't support your guy. What about Santorum running ahead of Romney against Obama in battleground states? How come you never bring that up?jbock13 wrote:The brokered convention won't happen, so let's just get that out of our minds. That's something the media brings up just to cover a slow news day.They are not advising us how in regards to Romney. They are encouraging people to vote for Santorum over Romney. Now unless they are working a double double switcharoonie I think it's obvious who they want to face and who they don't want to face.
Once again, I'll ask, why would the Democrats advise us how to beat Obama?
jbock13 wrote: No, the bottom line is that you're not objective. You want your guy to win and are totally ignorant to all other facts that don't support your guy. What about Santorum running ahead of Romney against Obama in battleground states? How come you never bring that up?Because they are both running ahead of him on any given day and are both exchanging the lead on any given day?
jbock13 wrote:Olympia Snowe retiring is something that all of us can celebrate. There never was much a difference between her and the Democrats. Next, Susan Collins needs to go. Without her vote, Obamacare would have been killed in committee. I bet they both endorsed Romney right?To paraphrase the late Rev " the hounds of hell can endorse me, just so long as they don't expect me to endorse them!". Or was that Reagan? Or John Borek
ALUmnus wrote:You guys seriously need to think about getting an AIM chat room.Feel free to join in! Isn't AIM an AOL thing? I hate AOL