This is the location for conversations that don't fall anywhere else on FlameFans. Whether its politics, culture, the latest techno stuff or just the best places to travel on the web ... this is your forum.

Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke

#370909
While I am getting nervous about the language being used on the hill about this, the article fails to mention one piece of language...

Section 1031:
(a) IN GENERAL.—Congress affirms that the authority of the President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40) includes the authority for the Armed Forces of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection (b)) pending disposition under the law of war.

And section 1032, subsection (b)(1):
The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to citizens of the United States.

subsection (b)(2):
The requirement to detain a person in military custody under this section does not extend to a lawful resident alien of the United States on the basis of conduct taking place within the United States, except to the extent permitted by the Constitution of the United States.
Jax State 1/4/26

I see what you mean now. He is NOT Charles Barkley[…]

Transfer Portal Reaction

Yeah I agree, paper is better than nothing. Althou[…]

I agree completely, and I’ll add this too &m[…]

25/26 Season

First, I have no personal bias. There is no […]