- November 27th, 2011, 11:00 pm
#367531
.
cjsweat wrote:Whether you like or hate Rocco. one of the dumbest things I have ever read on here and that is saying a lot.wishbone27 wrote:I don't think you all know what you have in Coach Rocco. He is the best Coach you will ever get at Liberty. I don't think you all remember that before him you didn't win at all. Now you have a winning record every year. Yes you did not make the play offs, but go get another coach who is willing to Coach at Liberty and you will be at the bottom of the Big South every year. First of all, all you people out their who are saying you need a new coach have probably not played football or coached football a day in your life, except for maybe youth football which does not count. So if anyone replies to this thread in a negative way, who has not coached or played at the college level your thoughts shouldn't even be heard, because you have no idea. As for anyone else, go ahead. You don't know how much effort it takes to run a college program especially to have winning seasons every year. Coach Rocco works 18 hours a day for your school and you treat him like this. Great Christians you are!
I enjoyed reading the responses from Sly and others. I'm not near as mannerly as they are and this is one of the dumbest statements I have seen. First off, he isn't the best coach that we will ever get at Liberty. Unless you're God, and I'm assuming that you aren't, there's absolutely no way to predict that. I appreciate what Rocco has done for the program, but that doesn't hide that we aren't where we want to be in terms of success. When we were winning one or two games a year, all of us would have given almost anything to win 6 to 7 games a year. However, once this athletic department and the alumni saw the potential of the football program, they decided to invest. Rocco was given a really nice contract, our stadium was renovated to become one of the nicest in the country and the football facilities were renovated. The point is that a lot of people have invested a ton of money into this football program. Those investments never would have been made and should have never been made if someone's vision wasn't a really big successful football team. It's like investing your money into a company. You would research everything about that company before you bought their stock. If you then bought it and it fell below your expectations for a certain period, you would then sell it.
Rocco is making somewhere around $250,000 a year to make this program be really successful. If we're paying him, then we have the right to call him out despite our football experience. Anyone who would be classified as paying him would be anyone who has contributed anything to the school. Furthermore, just because some don't have any football experience doesn't mean they aren't a credible source. For example, Bill Bellicheck(spelling) had almost no previous football experience before he got into coaching. Look at how he's faired. Roger Goodell has never coached or played a game in his life, yet he makes credible football decisions every day. Almost half of the people at ESPN have absolutely no prior sports experience yet, they make public opinions every day that have an effect on a sport. The point is that we don't have to know anything about football to be able to judge someone about it. It doesn't take a genius to look at results and make a decision. I'm not advocating that we fire Rocco by any means, however, to say that the majority of the people on this board don't know what they are talking about is stupid.
I don't care how much effort it takes to run a College football program and I don't care if Rocco has done a "good job" or not. My concern is that there are many other schools having success in areas that we should be. My concern is that SB, a program that barely invest in their football, has passed us in terms of a more successful history. There is nothing in the bible about being critical and I don't think LU should have to settle for average results.
.





- By thecomeback
- By jmclaughlin