righthash wrote:I think some of you are forgetting a major hurdle that our coaches have had to take on in the recruiting process: Liberty is a Christian school with a different lifestyle than secular schools. That is a major deterrent for some players coming in (whether you want to believe it or not, not everyone wants to better themselves when they are 18-19 years old).
Everyone recognizes the inherrant obstacles to recruiting to Liberty. Those coaches who have turned that negative into a positive in their recruitng have been the most successful on the campus. Not easy. I would argue its most difficult in football. But it's still a weak argument, because almost as many out there are willing to give LU a second look
because of its mission, as opposed to those who won't consider it on this basis.
righthash wrote:They have worked their butts off to get players in here that can help us win games, and they have done just that.
Agreed. But ability to win games should not be the
only criteria for a student-athlete at Liberty University. I could be wrong or in the minority, but I believe that's what many on this board mean when they talk about the long-term vision for athletics and the University a sa whole when it was first a glint in Dr. Falwell's eye.
righthash wrote:It takes more than 3 years to turn a TERRIBLE program into a JMU or William and Mary. Those teams have a tradition of winning that wasn't built in 5-6 years. Just take a snapshot of where we were before Rocco, and where we are now. Period.
Exclamation point! I couldn't agree more with you. Normal or even rabid sports fans are the least rational sect of society. Liberty's fans are no different - maybe even an eke worse because of the perceived "moral grounding" for their fanhood.
righthash wrote:They will win out this year.
A bold statement. Of course I'm rooting for it. But, I'm not guaranteeing it. Lehigh is GOOD. And, it's been awhile since we went through the BSC unscathed.