Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
GoEagles wrote:maybe you can hang a banner in your empty rafters for the 2 seed but let's see you win a championship in someone elses gym.what's that all about?
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
Chris Lang wrote:No. Coastal would have to lose three games in total for Liberty to even have a shot.Its pretty much a moot point now but that is whay I meant by my post...course now Coastal has to lose out and LU win out and with a final three of UNCA, G-W and CSU ( the first two in Conway), that isnt happening...

GoEagles wrote:WU still hasn't played good ball for two halves. But really flamerbob, seeding isn't going to matter if you are in the top 4. maybe you can hang a banner in your empty rafters for the 2 seed but let's see you win a championship in someone elses gym. I'm not mad by the way. As ke$ha says "we R who we R"Just wanted you to know there was no ill will intended in my post. I don't think that LU had more than a 2 point lead in either game versus Coastal, neither did any other Big South team. I hoping and praying some gets lucky in the tournament and knocks them out....(looking at you GW or HP)
g-webb1994 wrote:Name any Big South team that will not be better heading into next fall.....nobody is going to be decimiated by graduation or defections. Adding Campbell won't hurt, but I don't like the scheduling format they are proposing.Yeah, I mentioned in a thread on winthropfans that there are only 6 major impact seniors in the entire league (Corbin from WU, Warren from CSU, Gray from CCU, Moore from GWU, Williams from UNCA, and Kenon from VMI)...and even for teams losing one of those guys, that's the only hole they are having to fill going forward. Next season, the conference could be strong/competitive/experienced, with a potential of up to 20 impact seniors in the league (not counting whatever Campbell is bringing to the table).
FlamerBob....IMHO HPU would fare better against CCU in round one simply because they have more scoring, and a player like Barbour who can still take over a game. We just flat out don't have that yet....we have to play grind-it-out keep it in the 50's and within range in the last four minutes and hope to make a play or two...not a good match with Coastal's talent. If we play CCU within 20 Tuesday evening down there, I'll be pleased.
WinthropEagleFan wrote: (not counting whatever Campbell is bringing to the table).Trust me, not much.

PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ATrain wrote:I think ODU, George Mason or VCU would get an at-large before CCU gets one.I know it is a long shot but I could see all three of them getting in depending on how the last few games and the tourny go. All three of those teams are very good....and Hofstra is as good or better thatn CCU. I would say Richmond and JMU are as good but they seem to have fallen off here lately.
Chris Lang wrote:Their RPI is in the area of a lot of bubble teams, but RPI alone doesn't get you in. TTL is correct. Just no meat on the schedule. When you're hanging your hat on wins over LSU and East Carolina, that's not a good thing. Coastal's best RPI wins are the two against Liberty.
The bubble is extremely soft this year, though, so you never know. I think the only scenario in which Coastal gets considered is if it loses in the title game to Liberty, which wouldn't be a horribly RPI damaging loss.

Chris Lang wrote:Their RPI is in the area of a lot of bubble teams, but RPI alone doesn't get you in. TTL is correct. Just no meat on the schedule. When you're hanging your hat on wins over LSU and East Carolina, that's not a good thing. Coastal's best RPI wins are the two against Liberty.Actually, CCU needs to root for you guys to win out until the Big South championship since there could be a chance that gets LU into the RPI top-100..that adds a little meat to the resume, though I still don't think that would be enough (if that even happens)...
The bubble is extremely soft this year, though, so you never know. I think the only scenario in which Coastal gets considered is if it loses in the title game to Liberty, which wouldn't be a horribly RPI damaging loss.
BJWilliams wrote:The 'time' part is really insignificant...it could happen any year, it just has to be a case where teams do well enough and have quality wins (and it wouldn't hurt to have two or three teams do it in the same year, so their games against each other are also considered against 'quality' opponents). Obviously that's easier said than done, but there's nothing that prevents that from happening beyond the teams actually doing it...the NCAA doesn't discriminate against the Big South due to the name or reputation of the league..there just hasn't been a case where multiple bids have been warranted.Chris Lang wrote:Their RPI is in the area of a lot of bubble teams, but RPI alone doesn't get you in. TTL is correct. Just no meat on the schedule. When you're hanging your hat on wins over LSU and East Carolina, that's not a good thing. Coastal's best RPI wins are the two against Liberty.
The bubble is extremely soft this year, though, so you never know. I think the only scenario in which Coastal gets considered is if it loses in the title game to Liberty, which wouldn't be a horribly RPI damaging loss.
I was looking at their schedule before my prior post and that's about what I was thinking...LSU is tied for worst record in the SEC right now (conference and overall) and ECU is 7th in a Conference USA that isnt exactly worth writing home about either...its gonna take some time (and some quality wins) for this to become a 2 bid league
jimflamesfan wrote:Question: Does the Big South Conference regular season winner still get an automatic bid to the NIT if they lose in the Big South Tournament? So if Liberty mananged to upset Coastal, Coastal would still go to the NIT, right?The NIT still takes the regular season champ. I don't think they are obligated to take anyone from the Big South if CCU ends up winning the Big South tourney.
And if Coastal wins the Big South Tournament, would Liberty then get a bid to the NIT since Coastal of course would be headed to the Big Dance and LU would be next in line in the Big South?
If that's the case...coming in 2nd in the regular season at least means something. By coming in second, a team greatly increases it's chances of at least having somekind of postseason game.
WinthropEagleFan wrote:With Moore being out for a big chunk this season, the playing time and adjustments made will make the loss of him alot easier to bear.g-webb1994 wrote:Name any Big South team that will not be better heading into next fall.....nobody is going to be decimiated by graduation or defections. Adding Campbell won't hurt, but I don't like the scheduling format they are proposing.Yeah, I mentioned in a thread on winthropfans that there are only 6 major impact seniors in the entire league (Corbin from WU, Warren from CSU, Gray from CCU, Moore from GWU, Williams from UNCA, and Kenon from VMI)...and even for teams losing one of those guys, that's the only hole they are having to fill going forward. Next season, the conference could be strong/competitive/experienced, with a potential of up to 20 impact seniors in the league (not counting whatever Campbell is bringing to the table).
FlamerBob....IMHO HPU would fare better against CCU in round one simply because they have more scoring, and a player like Barbour who can still take over a game. We just flat out don't have that yet....we have to play grind-it-out keep it in the 50's and within range in the last four minutes and hope to make a play or two...not a good match with Coastal's talent. If we play CCU within 20 Tuesday evening down there, I'll be pleased.