flamesbball84 wrote:"Apple won't do anything that makes the user feel like the thing is slow"
Never try loading a PDF on an iPod Touch or iPhone then.
PDFs load fine on my iPhone 3GS. I've never once had a problem with it.
flamesbball84 wrote:"They have small screens."
So the iPad is better because it has a 9.7" screen that is "bigger" than the Dell Mini's 10.1" screen? You can't possibly base any of your argument on screen size when the iPad's is smaller and not even true widescreen at that.
Actually, I can base my argument on screen size because it's all about how you use what you've got. If you're running any standard OS on a netbook, a large portion of your screen is going to be dedicated to toolbars and user interfaces that were not designed for such small screens. You can't rotate a netbook to portrait for web browsing.
This is far more usable than
this if you're surfing the web. So the Dell Mini 10 is 0.4" bigger. It's FAR less suited for web browsing, and that was my point. And let's not even talk about the quality of those displays. Not even in the same ballpark. Quality matters.
flamesbball84 wrote:I get 10 times as much storage space as the cheapest iPad...
You're comparing solid state storage to spinning disk storage. Apples and oranges. Yes you get more, but it's not the same. Especially in something that's designed to be constantly held and tossed around.
flamesbball84 wrote:...and the apps will be optimized for it (something that really is not that big of a deal when you have 1GB of ram and a 1.66 GHz processor on an XP system).
Optimization is not just speed. It has to do with being designed for the entire platform, including the interface and display type. That's what I was getting at. Almost everything you'd run on a netbook was not designed to be run on a tiny screen and I stand by my statement that almost all of it is terrible. Everything that runs on the iPad will have been designed specifically for it (or the iPhone).
flamesbball84 wrote:All that for just three dollars more than the cheapest iPad..
With nowhere near the quality.
That display is gorgeous. The capacitive interface is the best in the industry. The battery life is killer (thanks in no small part to the A4 proc in there). And it's in a 0.5" thick enclosure. You may not care about those things, but you can't just write them off as worthless either. I'm not saying everyone should be after those things. Netbooks obviously have their place. I'm just saying that they're not the same thing.
flamesbball84 wrote:the iPad has real potential, but it's a shell of a netbook, which I'm guessing is what apple has in mind as the major competitor for the iPad.
They may consider netbooks somewhat of a competitor, but they didn't just release a tablet for no good reason. As I said before (though it was ignored) EVERYONE has a tablet coming out soon. Most of them are nowhere near as nice as the iPad and they're all around the same price or more. Those are the iPad's competitors. Don't ignore the fact that I said I'm not even interested in this thing. I don't get tablets as anything more than a luxury/novelty item at this point. Yet everyone is coming out with one. Again I ask, what do you people think? Is the tablet market DOA?
I hate that I get treated like a fanboy for pointing out the positives of this thing or for saying that I don't think netbooks are superior in every way. I've been pretty critical of it, I don't really care for the thing and I don't even want one.