BarackNRoll08 wrote: As someone who doesn’t have healthcare because it is unaffordable,
you do KINDA need a job in order to afford healthcare....
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
BarackNRoll08 wrote: As someone who doesn’t have healthcare because it is unaffordable,
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
Hold My Own wrote:Ok...so she has a job...how would she get there? What we need is a healthcare/taxi service...now that is worth talking about!!!
Psalm34:1believer wrote:I do not believe that children are a punishment, and granted, Barack's statements in that context were a personal disappointment.
Do you consider this another disappointing statement or the reflection of the most liberal senator in the DC?
Barack Obama regarding residents of Pennsylvaniathey cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.
Psalm34:1believer wrote:How do I justify voting for Obama while be pro-life? Wow- it's a tough question, I'm not gonna lie. As a Christian, I believe that life should be given freely to everybody, even to the unborn. However, there comes a time where we have to decide, "is this one issue keeping me from voting for a candidate that could help boost so many other avenues?" It was tough. I have marched in Anti-Abortion rallies, and participated in Walks for Life for as long as I can remember. This election season will not change that. I will proudly vote for Barack Obama, and then proudly continue to rally for the Pro-Life Movement.I'll be honest. I didn't read past this paragraph because I was somewhat stunned. "is this one issue keeping me from voting for a candidate that could help boost so many other avenues?". I don't see how you can be pro-life and support life for the unborn and ask that question. How many people is it okay to kill to get better health care, lower taxes, a stronger military, help to the poor and a stonger economy? I don't mean to attack and be sensational here, but your statement treats the life of a human being as a bargaining chip. Help me to understand this and I will go back and read the rest of your post. If you already answered this further on, please ignore my message.
Innocent Bystander wrote: How many people is it okay to kill to get better health care, lower taxes, a stronger military, help to the poor and a stonger economy?

SuperJon wrote:I'm completely pro-life, but I understand it takes more than just a president to overturn something like Roe vs Wade. I agree completely with the McCain statement about Roe vs Wade. Abortion is terrible, but I'm not going to let that one single issue determine a presidency for me. Obama's stance on the issue is completely wrong but I wouldn't let that keep me from voting for him if he was solid on all of the other issues. The thing is, I don't think he is. Neither is McCain though.I could understand that if the candidate were not clearly pro-choice. For me, being pro-life isn't a selling point for me but being pro-choice is to guarantee that I will not support you. As a father, I could never, ever, under any circumstances, vote for a person who condones killing children.

SuperJon wrote:I'm completely pro-life, but I understand it takes more than just a president to overturn something like Roe vs Wade. I agree completely with the McCain statement about Roe vs Wade. Abortion is terrible, but I'm not going to let that one single issue determine a presidency for me. Obama's stance on the issue is completely wrong but I wouldn't let that keep me from voting for him if he was solid on all of the other issues. The thing is, I don't think he is. Neither is McCain though.I agree that it takes more than just a president. It also takes the supreme court. Have you looked at the age of some of our current justices? Stevens is 88. Three more are in their 70's. The next president is definitely going to be appointing at least 1 new justice, and maybe more. Unfortunately, I doubt McCain will be appointing justices that are much more conservative than Obama will.
Sly Fox wrote: I admit I am a bit confused as to her position. Is she a Obama supporter or just someone who is voting for him as the lesser of two evils in comparison to McCain? She seems to be leading more toward the latter based on the last post. Is that a fair assessment, Psalm?While I am a "supporter", I feel I am also choosing the lesser of two evils. I really liked Mike Huckabee, a lot. I have always been a Clinton fan, but if it had come down to Clinton and Huckabee, I really don't know what I would have done. The truth is, I just don't trust John McCain. I do not agree with 100% of what either candidate says. My vote in November will be a reflection of my personal convictions.
Baldspot wrote:Psalm34:1believer wrote:I do not believe that children are a punishment, and granted, Barack's statements in that context were a personal disappointment.
Barack Obama regarding residents of Pennsylvaniathey cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.Do you consider this another disappointing statement or the reflection of the most liberal senator in the DC?
Sly Fox wrote:First off, big ups to Psalm 34:1 Believer for stepping forward to state her case in what clearly is at times a way too hostile forum. She is willing to engage in discussion and she is exactly what everyone was asking for in the other thread. So let's see some folks step up and ask her the hard questions.i think all anyone wanted was an intelligent discussion regarding the matter... something barack and roll didn't offer. so she got lambasted....i agree it sounds like psalms is doing a lesser of too evils vote and has also unfortunately bought into the whole change/hope crap.
I admit I am a bit confused as to her position. Is she a Obama supporter or just someone who is voting for him as the lesser of two evils in comparison to McCain? She seems to be leading more toward the latter based on the last post. Is that a fair assessment, Psalm?
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
Innocent Bystander wrote:First off, I apologize if my statements offend you. I do not mean to place a human life as a bargaining chip. Again, this is a tough issue for me. I believe Senator Mccain merely uses his alleged "pro life" stance just to attract voters. He's always been wishy-washy on the issue, and I have no doubt he will continue to be. Even if he was telling the complete truth, and he acted fully upon his word, turning over roe vs. wade and closing down all abortion clinics across the nation within three months of his election--that would be catastrophic. Women would scramble for back alley hanger abortions, or other destructive methods. Abortion, like anything else, is not going to disappear over night. It's a steady process. If we can first limit the number, by mandating that, within a set time frame, only those at health risk, or those who were raped, or were a case of incest could have the option for abortion. I do believe that if the mother is at risk, abortion is the choice between the parents of such said child. ---This isn't going to go away anytime soon, no matter who we elect. I also feel that by improving the economy and better sex education programs in our schools, we can help curtail the number of abortions drastically as well.Psalm34:1believer wrote:How do I justify voting for Obama while be pro-life? Wow- it's a tough question, I'm not gonna lie. As a Christian, I believe that life should be given freely to everybody, even to the unborn. However, there comes a time where we have to decide, "is this one issue keeping me from voting for a candidate that could help boost so many other avenues?" It was tough. I have marched in Anti-Abortion rallies, and participated in Walks for Life for as long as I can remember. This election season will not change that. I will proudly vote for Barack Obama, and then proudly continue to rally for the Pro-Life Movement.I'll be honest. I didn't read past this paragraph because I was somewhat stunned. "is this one issue keeping me from voting for a candidate that could help boost so many other avenues?". I don't see how you can be pro-life and support life for the unborn and ask that question. How many people is it okay to kill to get better health care, lower taxes, a stronger military, help to the poor and a stonger economy? I don't mean to attack and be sensational here, but your statement treats the life of a human being as a bargaining chip. Help me to understand this and I will go back and read the rest of your post. If you already answered this further on, please ignore my message.
Psalm34:1believer wrote:While I am a "supporter", I feel I am also choosing the lesser of two evils. I really liked Mike Huckabee, a lot. I have always been a Clinton fan, but if it had come down to Clinton and Huckabee, I really don't know what I would have done. The truth is, I just don't trust John McCain. I do not agree with 100% of what either candidate says. My vote in November will be a reflection of my personal convictions.Fair enough. I think many of us on the board will be voting for McCain not becaus eof who he is but because of who he isn't.
Psalm34:1believer wrote:Ok, Baldspot. We may disagree on this. I have lived in Pennsylvania for a few years now. Have you ever been to Northern Pennsylvania; such as Scranton or other areas. Racism abounds, almost to a crazy standard. Central Pennslyvania is made up primarily of Old-school baptists, most over the age of 40. I believe Barack's statement was not appropriate, although, not entirely false.Paging Baldspot. I feel confident he'll answer your question strongly in the affirmative. But are you implying the racism comes primarily from middle-aged white Baptists?
Psalm34:1believer wrote:To label Mr. Obama as the most liberal candidate in Washington? I'm not sure I agree with that.http://nj.nationaljournal.com/voteratings/
Psalm34:1believer wrote:While he may appear to more evangelicals than Obama, Seantor Kerry's viewpoints differ greatly from those of most voting evangelical americans. Other extremely liberal senators, such as Biden, Whitehouse, or Sanders hold some pretty libral ideologies close to their hearts as well.Are you trying to assert Obama's guilt by association or defend his position.