There are many cities larger than Lynchburg without an interstate. According to the most recent
US Census Bureau projections for the City of Lynchburg for July 11, 2007 the city has 71,282 residents. I really don't want to sit down with a map but I am confident there are scores of larger cities without an interstate running through it.
Here in Texas alone there is Sugar Land (Jesse Sanders' hometown), San Angelo, McAllen, Killeen (Danika Dale's hometown), Frisco, College Station (home to Texas A&M), Brownsville, Bryan and Allen. I left off about 15 cities without an interstate passing through it since they were within 5 miles or so of one. Even if you leave off the suburbs I listed that are reasonably far from an interstate (Sugar Land, Frisco & Allen) you would still have six cities would larger population and there were probably 10 more just below Lynchburg in population without an interstate in Texas alone. Suffice it to say by any standards that as a city Lynchburg is nowhere near the largest city without an interstate in America. In fact it may not even be in the Top 50.
Perhaps you would prefer to use the
metropolitan area designation for comparisons. Let's explore that as well. The US Census Bureau estimates the population of the Lynchburg metro at 243,580. The following metropolitan areas have larger populations without an interstate:
- Anchorage (362,340)
Atlantic City (270,644)
Boulder (290,262)
Fresno (899,348)
McAllen/Edinburg/Mission, TX (710,514)
Merced, CA (245,514)
Modesto (511,263)
Myrtle Beach/Conway (249,925) ** We're not even the largest in the Big South **
Salinas, CA (407,637)
San Luis Obispo/Paso Robles, CA (262,436)
Santa Cruz/Watsonville, CA (251,747)
Santa Rosa/Petaluma, CA (464,435)
Visalia/Porterville, CA (421,553)
Being the 14th largest metro without an interstate is rather impressive. But far from being the largest by any measure. Someone mentioned land mass and you don't want to even think about talking about Lynchburg in comparison to metros in western states.