- July 10th, 2008, 7:53 pm
#184691
I bought a book a few weeks ago written by Tom Glavine during the 1996 season. The title is "None But The Braves" (Title derived from a part of the book where he talks about his dealings with contracts, and how money isn't important to him - and that he wouldn't want to play for any other team).

I've just now got to the chapter on his dealings with the 94 strike, and it sheds new light on it for me.
That Tom Glavine is a d-bag.
First of all, Tommy boy - if money isn't important to you, why can't you be like Chipper Jones and take less money to stay with one team, instead of going to a divisional team with one of the highest payrolls in baseball. I guess you didn't think about that happening in 96. That's okay - cause I can let that pass.... while you were gone, we had to have someone that we could beat up everytime we played the Mets. Oh, and cool thing to do, when you finally come back to us, hurt your arm and win only 1 game for us. D-bag.
Second of all, Tom Glavine feels as if he is the most humble man alive. He just wanted what was best for baseball during the strike. According to Glavine, the strike wasn't about greed (and apparently anyone that says any baseball player that ever lived is greedy, then he should be punched in the baby-maker). He talks about, "it was about the principle." I never really followed the strike of 94, but according to Glavine, the main conflict between players and owners was all about the owners not contributing to the players' pension. (According to wikipedia, it was about a proposed salary cap that players were against). Even if the main idea of striking is behind pension - are you really gonna be bad off with 8 million dollars a year? How about get out of your $25 million dollar ranch and move to a $3 million dollar home on a nice country club and save $22 million dollars for what may come down the road.
Glavine, thanks for winning 300 games, mostly with the Braves - but dont give me, "It's about principle" bullcrap. You play ball because that's what you get paid to do. Fans don't spend their hard earned money for you to sit at home.
I've just now got to the chapter on his dealings with the 94 strike, and it sheds new light on it for me.
That Tom Glavine is a d-bag.
First of all, Tommy boy - if money isn't important to you, why can't you be like Chipper Jones and take less money to stay with one team, instead of going to a divisional team with one of the highest payrolls in baseball. I guess you didn't think about that happening in 96. That's okay - cause I can let that pass.... while you were gone, we had to have someone that we could beat up everytime we played the Mets. Oh, and cool thing to do, when you finally come back to us, hurt your arm and win only 1 game for us. D-bag.
Second of all, Tom Glavine feels as if he is the most humble man alive. He just wanted what was best for baseball during the strike. According to Glavine, the strike wasn't about greed (and apparently anyone that says any baseball player that ever lived is greedy, then he should be punched in the baby-maker). He talks about, "it was about the principle." I never really followed the strike of 94, but according to Glavine, the main conflict between players and owners was all about the owners not contributing to the players' pension. (According to wikipedia, it was about a proposed salary cap that players were against). Even if the main idea of striking is behind pension - are you really gonna be bad off with 8 million dollars a year? How about get out of your $25 million dollar ranch and move to a $3 million dollar home on a nice country club and save $22 million dollars for what may come down the road.
Glavine, thanks for winning 300 games, mostly with the Braves - but dont give me, "It's about principle" bullcrap. You play ball because that's what you get paid to do. Fans don't spend their hard earned money for you to sit at home.
bigtunacards.blogspot.com
bigtunacards.ecrater.com
bigtunacards.ecrater.com



- By LU Armchair coach