- April 30th, 2008, 11:48 am
#172992
Since we asked the other key stat categories, why not this one?
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
ToTheLeft wrote:Since we asked the other key stat categories, why not this one?Cause I hadn't gotten around to it.
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
jcmanson wrote:It was rhetorical, and I'm bored.ToTheLeft wrote:Since we asked the other key stat categories, why not this one?Cause I hadn't gotten around to it.
LUconn wrote: Because it could easily be 3 different people, depending on how things play out.You could say that about every statistical category because of all the change. We have 4 returnees, 4! That means there's 8 question marks and you never know how those question marks will blend in with the returners.
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
TDDance234 wrote:Sanders it is. The PG duties lay with him. With Holland gone and Lewis decomitting, we're really thin at the PG spot. It went from being probably our strongest position to our weakest in a span of 3 months.I'm not sure I would say weak, just VERY YOUNG and VERY INEXPERIENCED.
SuperJon wrote:I thought he was staying around next year to finish his degree, but wasn't on scholarship?Does that mean as a student or student athlete?
SuperJon wrote:I thought he was still going to be a member of the team if he wanted to be, but wouldn't be getting a scholarship. I could be wrong. It's happened plenty before.If the one scholly doesnt get filled by the beginning of the season whos to say he doesnt get it? Hes been on the team for a good time now, and if its open(I think we have one more) why not give it to him?
SuperJon wrote:You have to remember, we're likely losing one, maybe two.I know were losing one, I didnt think two though. What would we have done if we lost two?
I hate you Merry Christmas :D :lol: May[…]