- March 23rd, 2008, 10:41 am
#166133
why in the world would ANYONE other than a Pitt fan pick them to go to the final four?!
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
flamesbball84 wrote:why in the world would ANYONE other than a Pitt fan pick them to go to the final four?!Theyre hot in the best conference in the counrty. I didnt but a Big East Tourney Win goes a long way. Same with Clemson, who played very well through the ACC.
SuperJon wrote:Their record and conference season wasn't a true showing of their team because they had one of their top players hurt. With him back, they made a run through the Big East tournament, and people saw the real Pitt team that was there before Christmas. That's the reason people picked Pitt.Even when they got Levance Fields back, there wasn't a whole lot to be said about their resume when he returned. He returned against Marquette, they were 3-4 before the big east tournament after he returned from injury, defeating nobodies in syracuse, cincinnati, and depaul while losing to marquette, notre dame, louisville, and west va. Even when they were healthy, which was any game before Duke, they hadn't beat anyone worth talking about, with their best win OOC coming against Oklahoma St. Also, nearly everyone in America has failed to realize that in the Duke win, they lost a fifth year senior start that provided valuable talent, experience, and leadershp in Mike Cook that they failed to replace all season.
TDDance234 wrote:Liberty Athletics: Great for 2/3 of the season. Suck at the end.
flamesbball84 wrote:who cares if they're hot? It's a well known cardinal sin to pick an or slightly above average team from a major conference that went on a hot streak to either win their conference champ. game or reach it. Never pick teams like that to get any further than the Sweet 16. It happens to virtually every team with that resume. Why? They have already proven they are fairly beatable and they are an average or slightly above average team that got lucky and luck like that generally doesn't last more than 4 or 5 games, especially with that break in between the confernece and ncaa tournaments! Gerry McNamara's Syracuse squad and Pitt, Clemson, and Georgia this year are the most notable examples.Amen.
kel varson wrote:SEC and ACC aren't looking very deep with talent. Exceptions would be UNC and Tenn.Sooner or later everyone will have to recognize how good the Big East is.

HenryGale wrote:as far as i'm concerned, the big east has been the best ever since the year when marquette and the other schools entered it all at the same time.kel varson wrote:SEC and ACC aren't looking very deep with talent. Exceptions would be UNC and Tenn.Sooner or later everyone will have to recognize how good the Big East is.
SuperJon wrote:The knock on the Big East was that they're good simply by shear numbers. That's not the case anymore. Their top eight teams are very good teams. Granted, the bottom four are normally pretty bad, but the top half is always very good.The bottom of any conference is generally pretty bad, even the ACC even though ESPN likes to hype up the ACC like every team is an ncaa tourney caliber squad...
HenryGale wrote:If Davidson holds on and beats Georgetown...is it the biggest upset so far in the tournament?This is awesome, makes it a lot easier for my final four pick wisconsin to reach san antonio, plus everyone else in my pool had gtwon in the elite 8!
Sly Fox wrote:ODU's Gametracker has been stuck for me at 6-4.game is on espn2. the espn gamecast thing works just as well though.
cjsweat wrote:Bleacherreport is a very legit source.
Sly Fox wrote:3 of those 8 have football but just not in the Big East.I am just stating a fact....
cjsweat wrote:Bleacherreport is a very legit source.