[paradox]

You misread my post. I meant it to mean that If they use Smith in the middle, then he would need to be rotated with a more physical-type player.

[Purple Haize]

Ok, I have a feeling of Deja Vu all over again. How many coaches have we had recently that have bragged about their recruiting classs only to have it come up a tad short of expectations? I want to see what McKay can do with what he has (Whic I tink will be good) and see what he brings in. But that is just me

[LUconn]

would you rather him bring in a class of walk ons?

[kel varson]

I don't want any big "soft" guys on the inside.....you may but i don't.

So you would make the 6-10 guy a wing? Not that I have problem with it. If our rebounding is adequate and as long as he can handle the ball he should be fine.

This guys seems to have the talent to play a few positions it would appear.....but comparing him to sarchet in my opinion is no complement, plus he wasn't a banger at all.

I disagree. Sarchet was a good player.

[PAmedic]

Ok, I have a feeling of Deja Vu all over again. How many coaches have we had recently that have bragged about their recruiting classs only to have it come up a tad short of expectations? I want to see what McKay can do with what he has (Whic I tink will be good) and see what he brings in. But that is just me

Perhaps- but I think the difference THIS time is that it isn't the COACH talking up his big recruiting success. Its outside press (not just our SID)

we'll see in a couple years, I guess.

[jcmanson]

Coach was there with another possible recruit (possibly the kid's just a junior since we don't have any more schollies for next year). He was small, no bigger than 6 foot maybe 170.

[PAmedic]

Coach was there with another possible recruit (possibly the kid's just a junior since we don't have any more schollies for next year). He was small, no bigger than 6 foot maybe 170.

ball boy?

[Purple Haize]

PA I;ll agree with that. Still in the words of those great musicians "Once Bitten Twice Shy"!!!