Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
shukcb04 wrote:1shat·terparadox wrote:In other words he sustained a fracture of the lower leg.shattered and fractured have two totally different meanings.
...
paradox wrote:Shattered is the exaggerated term used when you can't otherwise explain why Gado is in the NFL and Goodman is not. Otherwise, you would have to admit that Gado was the better of the two.No he doesn't.....he hasn't seen the film yet.....hahahahahah - If you get that joke, its just one of many Karcher trademarks.
However, I realize that I am in the minority here, and that there is an overwhelming consensus on this board that supports Karcher's decisions reagrding Gado as the third-stringer![]()
I mean this is jest now, so don't get all girly on me: Just becuase a bunch of imbeciles hold the same view doesn't necessarily make it true...what I keep reading is that everybody says it was so, therefore it must be
even Karcher knows that he goofed that one up
![]()
...
paradox wrote:Shattered is the exaggerated term used when you can't otherwise explain why Gado is in the NFL and Goodman is not. Otherwise, you would have to admit that Gado was the better of the two.Shattered was exaggerated, but it was so serious that he was told numerous times he would never play football again...I say thats pretty bad...which is why it is amazing that he is even playing at all and shows how good he actually is....
...
LUconn wrote:So in your opinion, our starting RB was the worst of the 3. Got it.Because we all know Karcher's starters meant so much. He was a very good back, but not versatile.
paradox wrote:Shattered is the exaggerated term used when you can't otherwise explain why Gado is in the NFL and Goodman is not. Otherwise, you would have to admit that Gado was the better of the two.the only thing embicilic is the basis of your argument: that gado was a better college player because he has played in the nfl. if this were a "real" debate, your argument would hold no water. i had a better HS gpa than college gpa, does that mean i was a better high school student? not necessarily.
However, I realize that I am in the minority here, and that there is an overwhelming consensus on this board that supports Karcher's decisions reagrding Gado as the third-stringer![]()
I mean this is jest now, so don't get all girly on me: Just becuase a bunch of imbeciles hold the same view doesn't necessarily make it true...what I keep reading is that everybody says it was so, therefore it must be
even Karcher knows that he goofed that one up
![]()
...
paradox wrote:Your HS GPA has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not Gado was and is the better back.i know my HS and college GPA ahve nothing to do with each other, neither does nfl and college football success, you just proved my point.
All of the LU statistical evidence favors Gado, Karcher's poor decision making supports Gado, Gado's NFL experience confirms my position further, and the imbecility on the board infers a rather strong argument from inductive probability![]()
Just having a little fun ladies. Don'r get your hair in a tizzy![]()
And again, I thought that the other two backs were fantastic, just not NFL-caliber. I thought they were better than Gado too, until he actually played full-time, and ....ended up in the NFL![]()
...
paradox wrote:...and the imbecility on the board...You've surpassed your yearly quota of calling people idiots, stupid, imbeciles, etc. on the board today. You've been here long enough to know better. If you want to debate, have at it. However, ad-hominem attacks are not allowed.