- May 31st, 2013, 3:51 pm
#431056
This is awesome~! Congrats Liberty Flames Baseball!!!!! History is made!!
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
NG33 wrote:Great game for the Flames from beginning to end. Definitely proud of this group of guys.+1
Sly Fox wrote:Just woke up to this result. Unbelievable!
LUminary wrote:Would be an interesting twist if it's LU vs. St. Louis tomorrow night. Billikens have a decent chance for an upset tonight. Ace Clay Smith appears pretty good, and team has won school-record 41 games.
flameshaw wrote:It is early Saturday morning in Papua New Guinea as I get ready to fly to Japan. Up there I hope to be able to watch the next game online as it will be during more normal daylight hours over here.Sly Fox wrote:Just woke up to this result. Unbelievable!
Woke up? Unbelievable!!!!!!!
BJWilliams wrote:I think the bunts were well placed for the most part and it was good to see us cash in in a big way twice (I hope to see Trey Wimmer among the finalists for the Johnny Bench Award). I agree that this was a major win for us. Clemson (though a bit down of late with the rise of teams like UNC and UVa) is a name that still opens eyes if they are on the wrong end of a boxscore like they are tonightYes bunting with a 4-2 lead in the 6th, with a guy at the plate who came into the game at .338/.386/.506 and already had a ground rule double, is the right play so that you can follow with a guy who came in on a 1-25 streak and was 0-2 with a sac bunt of his own. That's like saying that you should throw into triple coverage because it worked once. The guys executed very well today, but they did so after being put into unnecessary situations. The Clemson pitchers had shown no ability to get our guys out and we kept giving them outs anyways. That's bad strategy even when it does work.
libertyfan4life wrote:Didn't say I would rather see us play St. Louis. And I'm not sure it would enhance our chances if we did. The point was that it would be unexpected to see LU-St. Louis in the winner's bracket game and SC-Clemson, the two teams most everybody would have assumed would win today, in the elimination game. I don't give a flip who we play. Just want another win.LUminary wrote:Would be an interesting twist if it's LU vs. St. Louis tomorrow night. Billikens have a decent chance for an upset tonight. Ace Clay Smith appears pretty good, and team has won school-record 41 games.
St. Louis?
I'd rather see Liberty fight South Carolina, and win. St. Louis is a yawner to me. All eyes would be on the South Carolina vs. Liberty game at South Carolina.
It would also be great to recap the season opener series with South Carolina that began the 2013 Liberty season. Liberty won one of the three game series and lost the other two games by a run each.
For me personally, there's just a little more history with Liberty and South Carolina, more so than St. Louis. IMHO, if we were to beat South Carolina, it would mean alot more to people probably than St. Louis even though a win is a win.
NotAJerry wrote:I came here to post the Run Expectancy Matrix that was referenced in the article NAJ linked. Bunting may work, but statistically it's almost always the wrong decision. The only time it's really a good play is late in a game when you're playing for a single run.BJWilliams wrote: Pretty is right...Perritt also is a fast enough guy that he could have beat that one out as well...remember now, Perritt bunted in the third, reached on an error, COrdell then bunted and Wimmer blasted a double. This time. COrdell worked a walk and Wimmer cashed it in with his three wood. Now if say J-Size or Close was bunting with a two run lead, THAT would be worth questioningBunting in any situation other than a late game scenario where you need exactly 1 run is statistically horrible strategy. We've defied the odds today and scored multiple runs twice after bunting. Even in the situation where you need 1 run, it's not actually the wise percentage play. The expanded chart at the bottom of the link shows that the run expectancy (MLB not college) with a runner on 1B with 0 out is 44.1% while it drops by 41.8% with a runner on 2B with one out. Bunting actually decreases your chance of scoring in that situation.
http://shutdowninning.com/5/post/2012/0 ... iness.html
SuperJon wrote:Beej, isn't your wife in labor right now?+10000000000000000000000000
thepostman wrote:I can't stand Toman, but who the heck cares about my personal opinions?? We just won big and I am so happy for these guys and for my school.May better position him for a job somewhere else?
It will be a fun couple of days for sure