- February 12th, 2011, 8:02 pm
#339876
We lead 54-51 with the ball and :24 to play. They wait til :13 to foul Emily. She makes 1-2. 2 posession game. That SHOULD be it.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, thesportscritic
jbock13 wrote:Somebody needs to explain to the lady ref what traveling is and is not. Far as I can tell she obviously doesn't know. LU leads 48 to 42 with 8 remaining.Why? Do YOU Know what constitutes a travel? I bet you would be suprised.
Purple Haize wrote:Well haize, why don't you explain it to her?jbock13 wrote:Somebody needs to explain to the lady ref what traveling is and is not. Far as I can tell she obviously doesn't know. LU leads 48 to 42 with 8 remaining.Why? Do YOU Know what constitutes a travel? I bet you would be suprised.
Cider Jim wrote:If Avery finished with 20 rebounds, she was only 3 short of tyingTeresa Bream's LU record of 23 boards in a single game.
jbock13 wrote:Why would I want to do that, when clearly you would be the one who has a lack of rules knowledge and interpretationPurple Haize wrote:Well haize, why don't you explain it to her?jbock13 wrote:Somebody needs to explain to the lady ref what traveling is and is not. Far as I can tell she obviously doesn't know. LU leads 48 to 42 with 8 remaining.Why? Do YOU Know what constitutes a travel? I bet you would be suprised.haha
Purple Haize wrote:Nice try, no bait.
Why would I want to do that, when clearly you would be the one who has a lack of rules knowledge and interpretation
Cider Jim wrote:Coach Reeves used to have 2 daughters who coached with him (both of whom played for LU), but I only saw one of them on the bench. Anyone know what the other daughter is doing these days? Is she coaching somewhere else or a full-time mom?She is at MTSU.
jbock13 wrote:Well that is awfully big of you to admit you don't know what you are talking about when it comes to officiating. You know, admitting you have a problem means you are half way there!Purple Haize wrote:Nice try, no bait.
Why would I want to do that, when clearly you would be the one who has a lack of rules knowledge and interpretation
Purple Haize wrote:Not sure when I ever said that. But when it comes to you obviously trying to pick a fight over me noticing one ref who doesn't know what travelling is, its a bit comical. I like you haize. Keep it that way.jbock13 wrote:Well that is awfully big of you to admit you don't know what you are talking about when it comes to officiating. You know, admitting you have a problem means you are half way there!Purple Haize wrote:Nice try, no bait.
Why would I want to do that, when clearly you would be the one who has a lack of rules knowledge and interpretation
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ToTheLeft wrote:Yeah, the whole refs = pope thing is half troll-like, half annoying, and half hilarious. Yes, three halves. Like ManBearPig.Interesting comparison. So, if you taste something that you think is awful, but someone who is a trained culinary professional is outstanding, who is right who is to say whether the chef did a good job or not?
believe it or not, refs are not perfect, and some are downright bad at what they do. Could I do it better? No. Absolutely not. But I know when a chef is doing his job well, even if I can't cook as well as him, so I can tell if a ref is doing his job right even if I don't know how to ref. I consider the final product.
Purple Haize wrote:I wasn't defending the notion that a referee doesn't know the rules.ToTheLeft wrote:Yeah, the whole refs = pope thing is half troll-like, half annoying, and half hilarious. Yes, three halves. Like ManBearPig.Interesting comparison. So, if you taste something that you think is awful, but someone who is a trained culinary professional is outstanding, who is right who is to say whether the chef did a good job or not?
believe it or not, refs are not perfect, and some are downright bad at what they do. Could I do it better? No. Absolutely not. But I know when a chef is doing his job well, even if I can't cook as well as him, so I can tell if a ref is doing his job right even if I don't know how to ref. I consider the final product.
I never said that officials are perfect but I will tell you without a doubt that officials, especially at the D1 level, have a more acute understanding of what constitutes a travel then either you or JBOCK. Do officials miss calls? Yep, I KNOW I missed one this past weekend and it makes me mad. Was it because of some lack of rules knowledge or skill? Nope. It was because of the timing of a rotation and what match up I chose to watch. The point being there is a HUGE difference between missing a traveling call, which in this case I am not even sure happened, and not knowing the rule. So if you would like the "troll like" postings to cease, then stick to the way the game was played not officiated
ATRAIN - Normally I would agree with you but with BWALL on the board, I would bump that number up to 99.5% HA