- December 29th, 2009, 9:05 pm
#293064
We have taken the lead 34-33 a couple of minutes into the second half.
Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, thesportscritic
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
flames1971 wrote:I hope so. G-W looks to be pretty good and HPU was picked to win the league along with us. The conference seems to be much improved.Man, I was so hoping we could pull this out. Oh well. Happened for a reason. I'm sure we'll dominate the Big South though.
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
jcmanson wrote:...which is a good thing.flames1971 wrote:I hope so. G-W looks to be pretty good and HPU was picked to win the league along with us. The conference seems to be much improved.Man, I was so hoping we could pull this out. Oh well. Happened for a reason. I'm sure we'll dominate the Big South though.
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
jcmanson wrote:GW has impressed me with a win over Purdue and CSU hung with UNC, but HPU isn't all that impressive this year. We've got to start figuring out a way to win these big non-conference games.flames1971 wrote:I hope so. G-W looks to be pretty good and HPU was picked to win the league along with us. The conference seems to be much improved.Man, I was so hoping we could pull this out. Oh well. Happened for a reason. I'm sure we'll dominate the Big South though.
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
ATrain wrote: We've got to start figuring out a way to win these big non-conference games.I take it you're only talking about this year's team because our women's program has a solid tradition of winning "big non-conference games." And to this year I'd say:
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
jcmanson wrote:I was referring to this year's team more than anything, but overall since 2005 it seems like we've had more chances for big wins and just haven't been able to capitalize. Injuries/youth seem to be a big part of that as since 2005 we've never been able to have a really healthy, experienced squad.ATrain wrote: We've got to start figuring out a way to win these big non-conference games.I take it you're only talking about this year's team because our women's program has a solid tradition of winning "big non-conference games." And to this year I'd say:
1 SR, 2 JRs; give 'em time.
Although I'd say for this young of a team that Tulane and Navy were "big non-conference games."
PAmedic wrote:you're absolutely right
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.