- March 24th, 2007, 10:58 am
#71878
It needs to fit both ways. Let's assume, as has been suggested, that Cooper was our first choice based primarily on basketball criteria. He was made an offer which JB considered to be fair for a coach with high-major experience as an assistant, but for whom this would be his first head coaching job at any level, and keep in mind it is in the BIG SOUTH. He turned it down.
I have absolutely no problem with that. It's called negotiation, trying to get the best deal you can.
Now fast-forward a day or 2. Cooper is still the first choice, and JB looks at the budget, looks at the Big South environment, and maybe, just maybe, makes a call to the mansion. He ups the ante and comes back to Cooper with an offer which he feels is the most generous we can make for our situation, and a person of his qualifications. He makes it clear that this is our best and final offer. Cooper says sorry, but I would need another $50,000/year. At this point, if I am the AD, my response is "DON'T LET THE DOOR HIT YOU IN THE AXE ON YOUR WAY OUT!"
You see the issue then would not be "can we afford to pay more". I think we all know that if the right people want a certain person hired, we could grossly overpay to get him. The issue would be "why do we want to hire someone who obviously doesn't want to be here, and will only take the job if we overpay him?"
I think at this point, if you have another qualified candidate who is your second choice and is excited about being the coach at LU, you offer him the job. We don't need to be trying to fit square pegs into round holes.
Obviously I don't know if what I described is what went down, but was giving a scenario to illustrate that IMHO it is important that LU be a fit for the newcoach as well as him being well qualified, capable, and a fit for us.