- December 2nd, 2020, 11:22 am
#616985
Of course, none of this addresses the issue after next year, when you still have a roster full of players who have been given an extra year of eligibility. I wonder if the geniuses in Indy even gave a thought to the Pandora's box they were opening? I still haven't heard an explanation as to the rationale behind it. I can totally understand allowing anyone who chooses to opt out without losing a year. Giving an extra year to athletes who played a full season really doesn't seem to be justified or make sense.
paradox wrote: ↑December 1st, 2020, 11:49 pm Yeah, something's gotta give. Is there any word on an expanded limit for next year?I think at a minimum they will allow the return of all current players (including Seniors) plus those already signed in the early period. For Liberty, that would put them at 15 if both Parker and Cuffee return. The next question is, what happens if someone transfers out in the Spring? Can they replace them even though they are at or above the normal limit of 13, or is their limit now 15 regardless?
Of course, none of this addresses the issue after next year, when you still have a roster full of players who have been given an extra year of eligibility. I wonder if the geniuses in Indy even gave a thought to the Pandora's box they were opening? I still haven't heard an explanation as to the rationale behind it. I can totally understand allowing anyone who chooses to opt out without losing a year. Giving an extra year to athletes who played a full season really doesn't seem to be justified or make sense.