Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
thepostman wrote:Yeah. What's up with the jokers? They are so dedicated for football but can't be bothered for basketball? I remember reading their lame excuses last year. I don't get it.They say there’s too many games and they can’t do them all while balancing school, jobs, and girlfriends.
Jonathan Carone wrote:Based on football, it looks like they have the numbers where they could have a good representation for basketball without everyone having to be there for every game, they could work out some sort of schedule.thepostman wrote:Yeah. What's up with the jokers? They are so dedicated for football but can't be bothered for basketball? I remember reading their lame excuses last year. I don't get it.They say there’s too many games and they can’t do them all while balancing school, jobs, and girlfriends.
Jonathan Carone wrote:Oh I remember. Lame excuses. They don't all have to show up every game. Just half of them would be a huge improvement.thepostman wrote:Yeah. What's up with the jokers? They are so dedicated for football but can't be bothered for basketball? I remember reading their lame excuses last year. I don't get it.They say there’s too many games and they can’t do them all while balancing school, jobs, and girlfriends.
--Fumble (1961-2009), RIPChippy wrote:My wife and I can do without the screeching. It would be nice if the "LUnatics" showed back up to offer some "acceptable" noise. Nothing worse then an empty VInes and McCracken screeching . . .fingernails on a chalkboard times a million.I'm glad someone agrees. I admire his dedication but geeeezzzz
Cider Jim wrote:I've never counted them: how many Jokers are there at football games?Anyone remember the Boo Box?
Neo wrote:Liberty beat Navy in a closed scrimmage on Sunday, 61-54For what it's worth, Navy was 16-16 last year, and their current KenPom rating is 163, which is 12 higher than ours.
olldflame wrote:Neo wrote:Liberty beat Navy in a closed scrimmage on Sunday, 61-54For what it's worth, Navy was 16-16 last year, and their current KenPom rating is 163, which is 12 higher than ours.
ballcoach15 wrote:When you lose to St. Francis, you not get a high ranking anywhere.You know this is the Basketball section, right?
Purple Haize wrote:Doesn't matter. Only football does.ballcoach15 wrote:When you lose to St. Francis, you not get a high ranking anywhere.You know this is the Basketball section, right?
ballcoach15 wrote:Someone had posted that BB was ranked higher than FB. I was just being honest.At your age we are just concerned about your cognitive abilities
I have never understood why some folks get upset, lose sleep and get panties in a wad because someone may post something that's "viewed" as on wrong site. I could see it if someone started a new Thread, on wrong site, but making a comment comes under the "no harm, no foul rule".
FlamesHighontheTide wrote:http://www.espn.com/mens-college-basket ... ball-1-351I think RMK is going to get some national love for the turn around of this program by the end of this year. I just have a feeling the defense is going to be strong enough to shut down our best opponents this year. Even if the VCU game wasn't an in season game, that's a huge feat. Something is wrong with the rankings is 179 beats 81 by double digits. That something wrong is under ranking the Flames.
ESPN ranks us as the 179th best team in America, which is the second highest Big South team behind UNC-A (who was ranked 112th).
Other interesting notes:
We beat the #81 ranked VCU Rams and the #153 ranked Midshipmen from Navy.
I think Kenpom and ESPN will both be wrong about our Flames this year. BIG DANCE here we come in March with an upset win in the tournament.
- By Ill flame
https://twitter.com/ASeaofRed/status/1784281065328[…]
- By cruzan_flame13
SMU is ranked 89th in USNWR which is pretty wo[…]
- By ballcoach15