Coaching Candidate poll

Coaching Candidate poll#250865

By Rooster Cogburn - April 7th, 2009, 4:12 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:12 pm #250865

Take your pick! Post why!

#250867

By SuperJon - April 7th, 2009, 4:13 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:13 pm #250867

Why did you put Willis Wilson and Tommy Brown on there when Barber said he hadn't talked to them?

#250868

By jcmanson - April 7th, 2009, 4:13 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:13 pm #250868

Cline or Odom, voted for Cline.

El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.

#250870

By Rooster Cogburn - April 7th, 2009, 4:15 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:15 pm #250870

SuperJon wrote:Why did you put Willis Wilson and Tommy Brown on there when Barber said he hadn't talked to them?

Thought since they were mentioned by Chris I'd put them in. I can't delete them, can you?

#250871

By Ed Dantes - April 7th, 2009, 4:17 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:17 pm #250871

jcmanson wrote:Cline or Odom, voted for Cline.

No one from VT. Those two guys are recruiting coordinators and they couldn't even recruit Seth.

Twice.

"You won't have Nixon to kick around any more, because, gentlemen, this is my last press conference." - Richard Nixon
"You won't have Dantes to kick around any more, because, members of Flame Fans, this is my last post." - Ed Dantes

#250872

By ToTheLeft - April 7th, 2009, 4:18 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:18 pm #250872

jcmanson wrote:Cline or Odom, voted for Cline.

+1

It was my privilege to serve you today. If you have any feedback, please direct it to my Assistant Director....

#250873

By jcmanson - April 7th, 2009, 4:19 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:19 pm #250873

Ed Dantes wrote:
jcmanson wrote:Cline or Odom, voted for Cline.
No one from VT. Those two guys are recruiting coordinators and they couldn't even recruit Seth.

Twice.

That was Greenburg's fault

El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.

#250874

By jcmanson - April 7th, 2009, 4:21 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:21 pm #250874

Based on the early results from this poll, Cline will NOT get the job:

http://www.flamefans.com/forums/viewtop ... ight=mckay

El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.

#250877

By Rooster Cogburn - April 7th, 2009, 4:28 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:28 pm #250877

I am in the Cline camp because of the experience and the hope that he would bring us some BIG men!

#250878

By LUconn - April 7th, 2009, 4:36 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:36 pm #250878

I've got to say, out of all the polls we've had, this is the one I think we're all least qualified to vote in. And we've had a wide variety of subjects polled around here.

*please disregard this post if dated before 2017 and accept my apologies*

#250880

By SuperJon - April 7th, 2009, 4:42 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:42 pm #250880

Who voted for other? And if so, who is the other you want?

#250888

By ballah09 - April 7th, 2009, 4:58 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:58 pm #250888

Cline

#250889

By Cider Jim - April 7th, 2009, 4:59 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 4:59 pm #250889

ballah09 wrote:Cline

+1

His bio: http://www.soonersports.com/school-bio/mark_cline.html

"If Cider hit the books any harder, they'd press charges"--Lefty
"When you’re right you’re right"--Purple
"I shall not participate in many discussions..."

--Fumble (1961-2009), RIP

#250899

By dompennix - April 7th, 2009, 5:45 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 5:45 pm #250899

I want Cline but I don't think it will happen

#250907

By flames1971 - April 7th, 2009, 6:33 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 6:33 pm #250907

I voted "not sure"

SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.

#250915

By jimflamesfan - April 7th, 2009, 6:50 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 6:50 pm #250915

I voted for Cline, but I'd be excited about Cline or Odom. They seem to have VA connections.

#250919

By belcherboy - April 7th, 2009, 6:59 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 6:59 pm #250919

I voted for Soucie. No one on that list stands out to me as being a big name, so I'm good with the guy who has already been building the current program and system. I also like the fact he has been in close contact with our current recruits. I think he deserves a shot, especially with the list of options that we current have.

#250920

By SuperJon - April 7th, 2009, 7:02 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:02 pm #250920

Every encounter I've ever had with Coach Soucie has been a good one. From all accounts, he's a very good assistant coach. The players seem to really like him.

With all that being said, I can't help but lump him in with McKay. I know that he is not McKay and what McKay did doesn't mean he'll do it too, but I'm sorry, I'm human. I can't make that distinction. Most people I've talked to are the same way. No one has a bad thing to say about Soucie except that he's so tightly linked to McKay that they feel a little dirty. It's like your best friend breaking up with a girl and then you still hang out with the girl behind his back. It doesn't feel right.

#250922

By RagingTireFire - April 7th, 2009, 7:08 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:08 pm #250922

SuperJon wrote: It's like your best friend breaking up with a girl and then you still hang out with the girl behind his back. It doesn't feel right.

Is she hot?

Is this mercy-killing or cross-pollenation?
Only the strawberry knows.

#250923

By SuperJon - April 7th, 2009, 7:09 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:09 pm #250923

Eh. Definitely not ugly. Depends on the length of the skirt and the cut of the shirt.

#250926

By RagingTireFire - April 7th, 2009, 7:11 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:11 pm #250926

Hotness in certain clothes does not equal overall general hottitude. I'm disappointed in the potentially titillating aspects of this analogy. You can do better, Jon.

Is this mercy-killing or cross-pollenation?
Only the strawberry knows.

#250927

By SuperJon - April 7th, 2009, 7:12 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:12 pm #250927

RagingTireFire wrote:Hotness in certain clothes does not equal overall general hottitude. I'm disappointed in the potentially titillating aspects of this analogy. You can do better, Jon.

I was describing the best friend's girl. I didn't pick her. He did.

#250928

By Cider Jim - April 7th, 2009, 7:13 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:13 pm #250928

SuperJon wrote:Definitely not ugly.

Another one of BrysOn's lines.

"If Cider hit the books any harder, they'd press charges"--Lefty
"When you’re right you’re right"--Purple
"I shall not participate in many discussions..."

--Fumble (1961-2009), RIP

#250929

By RagingTireFire - April 7th, 2009, 7:18 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:18 pm #250929

SuperJon wrote:
RagingTireFire wrote:Hotness in certain clothes does not equal overall general hottitude. I'm disappointed in the potentially titillating aspects of this analogy. You can do better, Jon.
I was describing the best friend's girl. I didn't pick her. He did.

She sounds like one of those "I'm-dating-Jesus-but-we-can-still-all-be-friends" types. This never ends well. Your hypothetical best friend should have known better.

Is this mercy-killing or cross-pollenation?
Only the strawberry knows.

#250930

By Th3rd - April 7th, 2009, 7:21 pm

- April 7th, 2009, 7:21 pm #250930

RagingTireFire wrote:
SuperJon wrote:
RagingTireFire wrote:Hotness in certain clothes does not equal overall general hottitude. I'm disappointed in the potentially titillating aspects of this analogy. You can do better, Jon.
I was describing the best friend's girl. I didn't pick her. He did.
She sounds like one of those "I'm-dating-Jesus-but-we-can-still-all-be-friends" types. This never ends well. Your hypothetical best friend should have known better.

and if this hypothesis is right, then the girl will subsequently 1 month later start dating another guy... So what does that say about Soucie in all this?

4/28/2009 R.I.P. Jeff Taylor

ToTheLeft wrote:because accepting anything less than the best is, as Vanilla Ice would say, a felony

BJWilliams wrote:I think highly of the guy just because he is more of a man than most of you jackwagons