checkmate wrote:There have been times on FF where there appeared to be a lack of appreciation for the talent of these players. Like the "top 50" recruiting class was superior to the talent the previous staff positioned us with. But as we all have seen some on here will go to any length to cast a positive light on our direction.
And it is always convenient for you and others to play the "it is about more than winning and losing" card. The reality states different. We had really talented players in a position to make a run at another championship. Now some of those short-sighted critics are preparing for a recession and it is not the economy.
But hey we can believe the News and Advance headline that inspite of our 3-6 finish, losing one of our top two returners that the Flames remain "HOT". so our expectations can focus on top three finish?
First, we all know hes going to be missed, and its going to be a rough near next year with so many newcomers. As for the "positive light" there is no positive anything from BJ leaving. We cant fill that scholly, and Im guessing we wont. Even if we do it probably wont be with a BJ caliber player. Fine
But its very arguable, that BJ tranferring has alot to do with the severity in how each coach handled the rules here. Its implied that one coach told BJ that the rules here meant nothing and that he wouldnt have to follow anything. It possible even more provisions were made after BJ kept getting fines, but that a different ball game. Anyway so McKay comes in and values the rules here, or at least supports the idea of accountability here.
In that case, there is not a single chance that anybody who got everything would enjoy that drastic or a change. If I was told I wouldnt have to worry about the rules here and then within 2 years I was getting slapped in the face with pink slips with a coach who cared about them Id be pretty ticked too, maybe so mad that Id leave just to leave and it wouldnt matter where I went as long as I left
\