- February 10th, 2009, 4:36 pm
#232888
Pretty much ALUmnus. My broader point was that the whole concept of a 3 (or a 1,2 4, or 5) is not the future of basketball (or the present at LU for that matter). I keep thinking about "Realist" whining because "our post got injured", when in fact the guys who are playing for them in his place are better basketball players by far than Andy Beuchler. It's just that none of them fit his outmoded concept of a "5", so in his mind their team is incomplete.
There is no doubt Smitty fits to a T the old fashioned definition of a 3 as a guy 6'4-6'6 who is athletic and can shoot as well as rebound, but not really a good enough ball handler to be a full time guard. Throw in at least 1 who is a better ball handler, and you could have a pretty good lineup with 5 players who fit that description, .................or you could have an even better one without any. In our current setup, Baily Alston could probably play the small forward role which Kyle is now filling, and would be unstoppable.
There is no doubt Smitty fits to a T the old fashioned definition of a 3 as a guy 6'4-6'6 who is athletic and can shoot as well as rebound, but not really a good enough ball handler to be a full time guard. Throw in at least 1 who is a better ball handler, and you could have a pretty good lineup with 5 players who fit that description, .................or you could have an even better one without any. In our current setup, Baily Alston could probably play the small forward role which Kyle is now filling, and would be unstoppable.





- By LU Armchair coach
- By ballah09