- March 10th, 2013, 11:17 pm
#423071
jack_sparrow81 wrote:What would you have called that back in the day? When it comes to intentionally fouling players from the back when the offensive player has a clear shot at scoring, more needs to be done about protecting the players. Haventyou seen the movie Hoosiers? I`m bitter about the loss as you can tell.I can't help it if UM doesn't make FT's or Lay ups down the stretch. At game speed I would have gone with the flagrant foul ( I don't know what number since they don't have intentional fouls) but on the replay it looked like they got it right






- By thecomeback
- By Ill flame