- June 18th, 2008, 1:35 pm
#181663
I'll take the word of those who know BJ that playing time was not a factor in his transferring, but IMHO it is just as speculative for lefty to say categorically that BJ would have started til he graduated as for paradox to say he would have lost his job. Nobody really knows yet how good Curry, Stephene, Floyd, Weaver and Sanders are going to be. For that matter, we don't know if or how much BJ would have improved.
I do think there is a bit of excess nostalgia about what we have lost in BJ transferring. While he has talent, and is versatile, the fact is he was very inconsistant last year. He had some really productive games, and some others where he almost disappeared, and this is in a situation where he was playing huge minutes on a team with no depth. My take is that from a talent perspective, we have replaced him and perhaps then some. What we will miss is his experience. The results on the floor will depend on how rapidly the newcomers can adjust to D1 ball.