- April 6th, 2006, 2:33 pm
#10473
On a tac back to the topic................
The argument seems to be that to build a good team you need to have a good team. If you have a good team then BETTER players will come and make the team better.
In that light here is a question I have but don't know the answer too. How many players have been in RD's program for four years? Or how many have started and finished here? As I stated earlier, the tournament has shown us that teams that have been together for a few years at the mid major level can become "legit". My thoughts are that if we can get decent kids in here and improve them, then that should lay the foundation for our success. A pitiful example is football. When we had the ONE decent season under KK, you had a lot of linemen that had been around for awhile. Unfortunately he was not able to build on that success.
At any rate, that appears to be the route I would take to establishing LU's cred.
The argument seems to be that to build a good team you need to have a good team. If you have a good team then BETTER players will come and make the team better.
In that light here is a question I have but don't know the answer too. How many players have been in RD's program for four years? Or how many have started and finished here? As I stated earlier, the tournament has shown us that teams that have been together for a few years at the mid major level can become "legit". My thoughts are that if we can get decent kids in here and improve them, then that should lay the foundation for our success. A pitiful example is football. When we had the ONE decent season under KK, you had a lot of linemen that had been around for awhile. Unfortunately he was not able to build on that success.
At any rate, that appears to be the route I would take to establishing LU's cred.
If we don't succeed, we run the risk of failure. - GWB