Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke
Hold My Own wrote:haha, I wont even try and quote all your jabs at Burryourcurry hahayeah but he's not a little kid, he's a man
El Scorcho wrote:post at your own risk.
flamerbob wrote:I don't know. The more I think about this the more I think that f1971's brand of emoti-speak is far less annoying than some of you who already use big girl words.jcmanson wrote:I vote for a 5 year ban until she grows uip and uses big girl wordsHold My Own wrote:no kidding...we really do need that ignore button...its either the eye roll or the emoticon overdoseAgreed, we're not very nice to new people.
RagingTireFire wrote:flamerbob wrote:I don't know. The more I think about this the more I think that f1971's brand of emoti-speak is far less annoying than some of you who already use big girl words.jcmanson wrote: Agreed, we're not very nice to new people.I vote for a 5 year ban until she grows uip and uses big girl words
(I'd do the winkie thing here but that would defeat the purpose.)
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
RagingTireFire wrote:The winkie would've been the icing on the cakeflamerbob wrote:I don't know. The more I think about this the more I think that f1971's brand of emoti-speak is far less annoying than some of you who already use big girl words.jcmanson wrote: Agreed, we're not very nice to new people.I vote for a 5 year ban until she grows uip and uses big girl words
(I'd do the winkie thing here but that would defeat the purpose.)
dompennix wrote:Not all of her posts are pointless she brings good insight to the Womens Hoops forum...sometimes
ToTheLeft wrote:because accepting anything less than the best is, as Vanilla Ice would say, a felony
BJWilliams wrote:I think highly of the guy just because he is more of a man than most of you jackwagons
LUconn wrote:I think we run a lot of people off. Somtimes you can tell folks start posting just to stir up trouble. They deserve the flogging that we give them. But I think we've had some legitimate posters that have chimed in with first time posts and we jump at the chance to tell that that they're stupid if we disagree and make them feel bad about posting here. Why is that? Just messageboard mentality?you. are. stupid.
We need some new blood around here or it's going to start to be exclusive. More so than it already is.
SuperJon wrote: I love dc Talk.
Sly Fox wrote:In my experience with the Falwell family over the past 30+ years, they have never been shy about stating what they believe and standing by it. If anything it should be on their family crest.
Hold My Own wrote:
New thread: We're not very nice to anyone
ToTheLeft wrote:because accepting anything less than the best is, as Vanilla Ice would say, a felony
BJWilliams wrote:I think highly of the guy just because he is more of a man than most of you jackwagons
dompennix wrote:Not all of her posts are pointless she brings good insight to the Womens Hoops forum...sometimesdom man for wanting to take things slow you sure are putting your neck out there defending her
i kid i kid
flamesfilmguy wrote:Yeah the key word was sometimes, I agree most the posts are pointlessdompennix wrote:Not all of her posts are pointless she brings good insight to the Womens Hoops forum...sometimesdom man for wanting to take things slow you sure are putting your neck out there defending her
LUconn wrote:I think we run a lot of people off. Somtimes you can tell folks start posting just to stir up trouble. They deserve the flogging that we give them. But I think we've had some legitimate posters that have chimed in with first time posts and we jump at the chance to tell that that they're stupid if we disagree and make them feel bad about posting here. Why is that? Just messageboard mentality?well good sir let me be the first to tell you, i am the new blood
We need some new blood around here or it's going to start to be exclusive. More so than it already is.
dompennix wrote:Not all of her posts are pointless she brings good insight to the Womens Hoops forum...sometimesSometimes?!?!?!?!?!??!
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
Hold My Own wrote:
New thread: We're not very nice to anyone
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
dompennix wrote:You should.flames1971 wrote:Yeahdompennix wrote:Not all of her posts are pointless she brings good insight to the Womens Hoops forum...sometimesSometimes?!?!?!?!?!??!. But I dont read the Womens bball forum much.
SuperJon wrote:We're not building a 60,000 seat stadium. We're building a 30,000 seat stadium. The 60,000 number is when our grandkids have grandkids at Liberty.
- By cruzan_flame13
SMU is ranked 89th in USNWR which is pretty wo[…]
- By TH Spangler
- By ATrain