A Sea Of Red

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 7:22 pm**

Do we wear the blue pants this weekend or go back to the white ones since we lost Saturday?

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 7:25 pm**

I am all about supersticion....I say back to what you won in....but maybe thats just me

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 7:27 pm**

I don't believe in supersticion. It's bad luck.

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 7:28 pm**

When I was at Coastal, they had gotten brand new white pants for the season. Going up to App, we went white on white. We got beat 30-3, and Coastal's never worn white on white since.

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 7:31 pm**

I thought that was just b/c it was after Labor day.

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 8:10 pm**

I cannot express my disappointment that good, God-fearing, Bible-believing FlameFans are even talking superstitions. Gotta go with the white to change things up, though.

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 8:15 pm**

I can't stand the white on white look. Intimidation factor = 0. And yes, it does make a difference (just like any uniform change). I point you to our old royal blue/bright red, white combo. That made the team look like a bunch of high school geeks.

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 8:18 pm**

I think white on white looks like they're wearing long johns. It also looks cheap.

I'll stick with the navy blue.

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 9:04 pm**

The White looks like crap.

Its not like we didnt play well against W+M

Posted: **September 18th, 2007, 9:06 pm**

I forgot about the white road jerseys. Must stay with blue pants, then.

Posted: **September 19th, 2007, 1:42 pm**

I like white-on-white. My favorite bowl subdivision team wears that combo quite often on national TV, and I think it looks great.

Posted: **September 19th, 2007, 2:02 pm**

JK37 wrote:I like white-on-white. My favorite bowl subdivision team ..... and I think it looks great.

I hope its not Oregon

Posted: **September 19th, 2007, 2:05 pm**

white on white only looks good with white helmets. Blue pants. Superstition not taken into account.

Posted: **September 19th, 2007, 2:54 pm**

Schfourteenteen wrote:
JK37 wrote:I like white-on-white. My favorite bowl subdivision team ..... and I think it looks great.
I hope its not Oregon

absolutely not

Posted: **September 19th, 2007, 11:25 pm**

White on white looks like pajamas. Only the boys from Happy Valley should be allowed to wear that combo.

Posted: **September 19th, 2007, 11:31 pm**

Posted: **September 20th, 2007, 12:51 am**

I was an outspoken critic of the white tops/white pants get up last year, but it grew on me over time, so it's not a bad look. But the White Top/Blue Pant combo is a sharp look.

Visual Aid:

Posted: **September 20th, 2007, 2:34 am**

Our numbers are blue, so the Texan obsession doesnt work

I just plain dont like white and white, very few look good

Posted: **September 20th, 2007, 2:36 am**

Schfourteenteen wrote:Our numbers are blue, so the Texan obsession doesnt work

I just plain dont like white and white, very few look good

He's right!!!

Sorry just wanted to feel like dox

A Sea Of Red

Superstitious? Nah...

Superstitious? Nah...