[JK37]

You can't win if you predict the incorrect winner.

Didn't read the rule book I guess; I assumed it was closest to score. If that's the rule then....it looks like JK37 won it. Great job!

Just listen to me more often, and all of you would be smarter!

[flamehunter]

You can't win if you predict the incorrect winner.

Didn't read the rule book I guess; I assumed it was closest to score. If that's the rule then....it looks like JK37 won it. Great job!

It only makes sense. I mean, if I predict Akron to win next week by a score of 56-0, but then the Flames win by that score, would you consider me the winner?

[Tnobes]

And you can't predict your team to lose and say "hope I'm wrong". That's like saying "I think your marriage is going to fail.... Hope I'm wrong"

Interesting take. I didn't see your prediction, just some commentary.....

Let me add an analogy, too

You can't complain about how someone makes their prediction when you don't make one yourself. That's like complaining about a candidate that won, when you didn't go vote.

Touché

[willflop]

Depends on how you do your math. You would add the error for each team, which would be 112 points off in the backwards 56 to 0 scenario, if getting the winner wrong was allowed.

[ballcoach15]

Why so few posters make a prediction ? Only 12 this week

[alabama24]

You can't win if you predict the incorrect winner.

Didn't read the rule book I guess; I assumed it was closest to score. If that's the rule then....it looks like JK37 won it. Great job!

Just listen to me more often, and all of you would be smarter!

I'm of the camp that to win you have to have the winning team right first, then the score.

Oh, and there is nothing wrong with saying "I hope I'm wrong."

[ballcoach15]

One has to pick winning team, to be declared winner, regardless of what score they pick.

[rtb72]

You can't win if you predict the incorrect winner.

Didn't read the rule book I guess; I assumed it was closest to score. If that's the rule then....it looks like JK37 won it. Great job!

It only makes sense. I mean, if I predict Akron to win next week by a score of 56-0, but then the Flames win by that score, would you consider me the winner?

Fine by me. It does make sense really. Honestly, when I was going through the predictions to show the winner, I just concentrated on closest score. Going forward, I'll pay better attention.