A Sea Of Red

Jake Webb wrote:Liberty logos (from google so the technical colors aren't exactly right):

Primary - https://www.google.com/search?biw=1723& ... y93hgfLVGM:

Monogram - https://www.google.com/search?tbm=isch& ... 9vEmvUwCHM:

Secondary - https://www.google.com/search?q=liberty ... YvC_neFVZM:

Jake Webb wrote:Liberty logos (from google so the technical colors aren't exactly right):

Primary -

Monogram -

Secondary -

Jake Webb wrote:

Jonathan Carone wrote:That’s the biggest issue with our logo: the letter mark isn’t good enough on its own, the secondary logo is a little too abstract, and together it’s too busy.

I’d love if we could get to where we used the secondary on its own. One thing Coastal did that has worked well for them visually is drop the word mark and let the Chanticleer head logo stand on its own. I don’t know how well that’s worked from a marketing standpoint but it definitely looks better.

I don't think our monogram (LU standalone logo) is too weak to stand on it's own — I just don't think we quite have the tradition of athletic excellence yet. Look at the the first 5 logos on that list (ND, LSU, Auburn, Oklahoma, and VT). Those aren't necessarily impressive logos, they just provide a since of athletic excellence and tradition with them. LSU and VT's logo are far too horizontal and OU's isn't anything impressive. I like the 1:1 ratio that ND and Auburn have, though.

While I'm very pro on athletic institutions rocking a wordmark and keeping the mascot logos to the professional sports (marketing purposes for both), I do agree that our new (2013) secondary logo is my favorite that the University (mainly in an athletic realm) uses.

Jonathan Carone wrote:

Jake Webb wrote:

Jonathan Carone wrote:That’s the biggest issue with our logo: the letter mark isn’t good enough on its own, the secondary logo is a little too abstract, and together it’s too busy.

I’d love if we could get to where we used the secondary on its own. One thing Coastal did that has worked well for them visually is drop the word mark and let the Chanticleer head logo stand on its own. I don’t know how well that’s worked from a marketing standpoint but it definitely looks better.

I don't think our monogram (LU standalone logo) is too weak to stand on it's own — I just don't think we quite have the tradition of athletic excellence yet. Look at the the first 5 logos on that list (ND, LSU, Auburn, Oklahoma, and VT). Those aren't necessarily impressive logos, they just provide a since of athletic excellence and tradition with them. LSU and VT's logo are far too horizontal and OU's isn't anything impressive. I like the 1:1 ratio that ND and Auburn have, though.

While I'm very pro on athletic institutions rocking a wordmark and keeping the mascot logos to the professional sports (marketing purposes for both), I do agree that our new (2013) secondary logo is my favorite that the University (mainly in an athletic realm) uses.

Weak may have been the wrong word for that because I definitely like the secondary the best. What I meant by weak is that, on its own, it doesn’t represent the word “Liberty” or “Flames”.

It’d be like Alabama using the elephant logo as their primary. That’d be weak branding because it doesn’t represent “Alabama” or “Crimson Tide.” But put in the context of Alabama, it makes perfect sense.

Likewise, our secondary logo makes sense when it’s on a jersey or hat, but would be weak branding if it was on its own on a list like what was posted earlier.

Class of 20Something wrote:TWITTER BEEF

Some ODWho fan posted a video of Brickhouse "shutting down AGG" but you can see the flag fly in too.

Half the team has started chirping at this dude on twitter.

thepostman wrote:yeah, at halftime the group I was with were all streaming different games on our phones without any issues. It was really a great thing and being someone who works in that industry I can attest that it is not an easy thing to pull off. There are a ton of things to take into account when installing wireless access points along with everything else needed to provide such high speeds consistently.

Job well done by whoever worked on that project.

BJWilliams wrote:That gives me something to look forward to because i couldn't do much of anything in the stadium last time i was there. Did they upgrade the whole campus?

BuryYourDuke wrote:So ODU just lost to Charlotte. Are we looking at another Baylor situation? Is ODU possibly the worst FBS team in the country? We will see.

BuryYourDuke wrote:So ODU just lost to Charlotte. Are we looking at another Baylor situation? Is ODU possibly the worst FBS team in the country? We will see.

BuryYourDuke wrote:So ODU just lost to Charlotte. Are we looking at another Baylor situation? Is ODU possibly the worst FBS team in the country? We will see.

Jonathan Carone wrote:

BuryYourDuke wrote:So ODU just lost to Charlotte. Are we looking at another Baylor situation? Is ODU possibly the worst FBS team in the country? We will see.

They definitely aren’t good.