Moderators: jcmanson, Sly Fox, BuryYourDuke, Class of 20Something
Jerry Falwell Sr. wrote: Textbooks are Soviet propaganda.
Jerry Falwell Sr. wrote: Textbooks are Soviet propaganda.
thepostman wrote:Anybody that aren't wearing the LU blinders care to weigh in?
R i wrote:Ian is going to the Baylor game.Sneaking in the back door?? Haha
FlamesHighontheTide wrote:I think there are so many unknowns for Baylor, which has led to a more positive outlook for our boys.Their O line depth must be bad . Our play calling was probably as bad as I have ever seen at college level. Granted it might have looked good "in the play book", but not on the turf.
Baylor is limping into this first game in their defensive backfield. Their O-line is depth is as questionable as our play-calling was last year. Their running back depth is also hurting with a suspension and injury. Finally, they are breaking in a new coach who went 28-23 at Temple. Add these up and you get saturation in the LU kool-aid!!!
Jerry Falwell Sr. wrote: Textbooks are Soviet propaganda.
R i wrote:The official Vegas line is much different than what some of the prediction sites I looked at yesterday. If you want to lay money on LU , you will be getting about 29 points.That's tempting
R i wrote:The official Vegas line is much different than what some of the prediction sites I looked at yesterday. If you want to lay money on LU , you will be getting about 29 points.
Purple Haize wrote:I was thinking it will be under 21.5R i wrote:The official Vegas line is much different than what some of the prediction sites I looked at yesterday. If you want to lay money on LU , you will be getting about 29 points.That's tempting
Just remember that fine academic institution, Loui[…]