R i wrote:The idea of hiring a Transition coach vs a guy that can build a successful program is intriguing.
I am hoping we can find the guy that can do both, but the more it is discussed I am seeing that my not be possible.
I think, given where we're at currently, the only way we can look at this next hire is as a 5-year coach. Ideally someone would build us into the next great thing and stay forever but the likelihood of that happening are as low as me eating a salad.
One of three things will happen:
1) We hire an up and comer who has success and is gone to a higher job in five years.
2) We hire an up and comer who doesn't win and is fired in five years.
3) We hire a proven program builder who has the experience needed and likely retires in five years regardless of our success or failure.
I'd like to think we can find #1. Whether that's a Brandon Streeter type or someone like Curt Cignetti, I'm willing to take that chance.
I'd also be okay with a recently retired coach who would want to come back and build something for the stability. A name that comes up who fits that description (with connection to Ian) is Jim Grobe. I'm not a fan of the Tommy Bowden type who hasn't coached in a decade though. It's less about age as it is about not having a connection to the current athlete. If you ask anyone who has been in coaching for more than ten years, they'll tell you the makeup and personality of today's athletes is vastly different than it was pre-2010.